Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The text treats the issue of when it makes sense to take precautions to a disease and when not. It is a question of balancing the interest of a community, the health and freedom of an individual and has often been discussed during the covid pandemic.
In the text there are mentioned two possibilities: routinely inoculation against cow flu or no inoculation against cow flu. I think there are two more options not mentioned by the the text: voluntary inoculation (meaning that everybody gets the chance to is inoculated against cow flu but does not have to) and inoculation of people with higher risks of dying (for example elder or ill people).
However, a decision between those options is not possible without data.
At first one needs data of how many people have cow flu and how many die caused by cow flu. By this the death rate can be calculated. A high death rate should lead to an inoculation of everybody while a low death rate is a reason for not routinely administering inoculations against cow flu.
Additionally this death rate needs to be further analyzed. It is important that possibly groups are detected in which the death rate is significantely higher than in others. Those groups should be treated differently and rather receive inoculations against cow flu that fewer threatened people.
An other important aspect is how the disease evolves when it does not end with a death: How long do people suffer under cow flu and are there lifelong consequences of being infected? Which symptoms do they have? How many people have to go to hospital or at least see a doctor?
So, there are many questions which can only be answered with data. If a certain percentage of people infected by the cow flu have severe problems maybe even over several days and have to go to hospital this is also an indicator that inoculations against cow flu is routinely administered where the disease is detected. Thus, a potential inoculation should not only be dependent on the death rate but also on the hospitality rate and a rate how many people get severely ill by the cow flu.
In the end, another important thing is the possibility of inoculating against cow flu. How well are the structures in that area in order to routinely administer an inoculation? How much does an inoculation cost? And on the hand the questions how much people infeceted with cow flu cost the system by them needing medication and being not able to work. For example if a routinely administerd inoculation is relatively cheap in comparison to a lot of people suffering cow flu this is also an argument for inoculation.
In conlusion, let me say, there is a lot of data required in order to make a decision whether inoculations against cow flu should be administered routinely or not. However, it should be highlighted that there are not only those two options and that data might also indicate that only inoculation of certain groups or in certain regions is needed. A decision on such issues concerning people's life and health it is always important to make well thought of decisions which are based on quantitive data and science while not depending on ideologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 69
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 543 350
No. of Characters: 2552 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.827 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.7 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.768 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 167 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 130 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 70 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.72 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.938 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.48 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e are two more options not mentioned by the the text: voluntary inoculation meaning tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e are two more options not mentioned by the the text: voluntary inoculation meaning tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 65, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun die seems to be countable; consider using: 'many dice', 'many dies'.
Suggestion: many dice; many dies
...of how many people have cow flu and how many die caused by cow flu. By this the death ra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...istering inoculations against cow flu. Additionally this death rate needs to be further ana...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: Another
...ow flu that fewer threatened people. An other important aspect is how the disease evo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 182, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...outinely administer an inoculation? How much does an inoculation cost? And on the ha...
^^^^
Line 12, column 247, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...cost? And on the hand the questions how much people infeceted with cow flu cost the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, at least, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.6327345309 173% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 55.5748502994 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2615.0 2260.96107784 116% => OK
No of words: 543.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81583793738 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8048323493 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410681399632 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 705.55239521 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9209027272 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.72 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.56 5.70786347227 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 5.15768463074 174% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337188671418 0.218282227539 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110738414444 0.0743258471296 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787227755177 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160075685608 0.128457276422 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912315410756 0.0628817314937 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 12.3882235529 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.