Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The argument is about saving life of people by inoculations against cow flu are routinely administered to all people in areas where disease is detected but there is possibility that a person die as a result of the inoculation so permit inoculation against cow flu to be routinely this argument has many flaws.
The argument is about inoculation against cow flu but there is also possibility that in some area cow flu has not spreaded. at that time administered not actually required in that area.and author has mentioned that , it should be administered routinely ,This is not necessary. It can be weekly or monthly.
The second point is that initially author has mentioned that it should be administered routinely and at last author mentioned , because of small possibility for person would die as a result of the inoculations basically contradict with each other.
The third point is that if there is area which highly affected by cow flu, treatment for that should be different from normal treatment author has not mentioned it properly.There is not anything which explain how to detect disease area.for better cure first that area should be detected properly after that area's people routinely administered.
In fact we can say there is not evidence for support of that argument,There are many statement which contradict it self.In argument information should be well defined and explained infer about that argument.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 33
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways forthe company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic ne 50
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important thanknowledge. 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nely this argument has many flaws. The argument is about inoculation agains...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
... in some area cow flu has not spreaded. at that time administered not actually req...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that area.and author has mentioned that , it should be administered routinely ,Th...
^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at , it should be administered routinely ,This is not necessary. It can be weekly ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary. It can be weekly or monthly. The second point is that initially autho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d routinely and at last author mentioned , because of small possibility for person...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cally contradict with each other. The third point is that if there is area...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...nt author has not mentioned it properly.There is not anything which explain how to de...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as people routinely administered. In fact we can say there is not evidence...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , There
...ot evidence for support of that argument,There are many statement which contradict it ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun statement seems to be countable; consider using: 'many statements'.
Suggestion: many statements
... for support of that argument,There are many statement which contradict it self.In argument in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...ere are many statement which contradict it self.In argument information should be well ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...many statement which contradict it self.In argument information should be well def...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explained infer about that argument.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, third, well, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 231.0 441.139720559 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25108225108 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94339257272 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 204.123752495 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 705.55239521 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.695222933 57.8364921388 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.285714286 119.503703932 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 23.324526521 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.70786347227 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.25449101796 266% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373097956507 0.218282227539 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182673306237 0.0743258471296 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138858741149 0.0701772020484 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224060327399 0.128457276422 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147378530239 0.0628817314937 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.3799401198 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.3550499002 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.197005988 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 98.500998004 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 12.3882235529 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.