" Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our stations' coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the progtam and to avoid losing any further advertisisng revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level.
The authors fails to support th conclusion on various accounts, firstly, the complains regarding the weather and local show is not evident enough to justify their ineffeciancy. Secondly, more contect is required for proving that advertisment in the first place were not responsibe for a good revenue. Thirdly, there is no evidence to show that there would be a surge in the number of viewers if former levels of weather and local news was re-established.
The complain from viewers could imply anything and invites a lot of assumptions which is not backed up by sufficient evidence to prove that it contributed in increasing the number of viewers. For all we know complains related to local and weather news could have been regarding the verbosity of content or high frequency of advertisments during these shows. A liitle more context related to news such as the complains were primarily regarding the lack of time, these shows ran the argument could strengthen , nontheless, the author still needs to provide irrefutable evidence that it can increase the viewer rate back again and advertisment played a minor role for the TRP levels.
Advertisment if targeted correctly to the right audience can contribute significantly in the TRP levels. The author fails to anticipate the gap regarding the cancellation of the advertisment and solely shifts his/her belief on the local and weather news shows. Even if we assume that local and weather news shows would increase revenue, the author still leaves room for justification by failing to provide concrete evidence for the fact that the revenue from viewers is tantamount to the revenue from the terminated contract of advertisment.
Therefore, author conclusion is unwarranted due the vague or unclear premises which is open to more than antithetical interpretation. Hence the conclusion is invalid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | seoul_milk | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Dinesh4518 | 64 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 56
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline students cannot be motivated by school or college alone 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for the past several decades food processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as pr 55
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 12 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 297 350
No. of Characters: 1527 1500
No. of Different Words: 155 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.151 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.141 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.891 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.678 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.909 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.16 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'fail'.
Suggestion: fail
The authors fails to support th conclusion on various acc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r and local news was re-established. The complain from viewers could imply anything and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... shows ran the argument could strengthen , nontheless, the author still needs to p...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... more than antithetical interpretation. Hence the conclusion is invalid.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, third, thirdly, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 296.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27027027027 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97330228482 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530405405405 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7268907553 57.8364921388 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.818181818 119.503703932 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.70786347227 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187663010611 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690838693312 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562984030395 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106349291306 0.128457276422 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634349987353 0.0628817314937 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.