Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
Author state that Ancient human eating system has some benefit, it can cure many chronic illness. Therefore, we should also emulate same diet. Ancient people food diet can be health, but will it be healthier for us also. Years ago, lifestyle was completely different a nd till now, a lot has changed. From different kind of food we produce to the way we cook. Hence, Author has made some stated/unstated assumption regarding the ancient diet.
Author has particularly mentioned Paleo diets and claim that it is becoming popular. Here, it is not mentioned which kind of diet. Later, Proponent supported that, especially bone broth a soup of cooking bone will promote nutrient, and mention cartilage regeneration. Here Auhtor has not provided any evidence about such medical claim. As per statement it is highly nutrient. So, Will it be beneficial for everyone. As every human body has different digestion system. Some can have allergy with particular food especially for non-vegetarian because is a animal bone broth. Further, Proponent Claim was denied by skeptics that neither it will replenish cartilage nor make brain healthier. Here, again skeptic oppose Proponent claim without any factual evidence. May be ingested cartilage may not help in replenish of cartilage in keen or elbow. In additionaly, skeptics also mentione about it will not make brain healthier which was not claimed by proponents. Further, they claim, that there is strong anecdotal evidence that it may reduce metabolic and inflammatory disease. All evidence is factual. Author has not given asn strong data to support the statement and conclude based upto popularity of Paleo Diet that Anicent were more knowledgable and particular about their diet and we should also implement it to in our system to cure many chronic illness
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 59 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Akash Konar | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | fabjaved | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hello_kratnesh101 | 47 | view |
- TPO 3 Integrated Rembrandt portrait the woman with fur collar 70
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problem 50
- The following memorandum is from the president of Primo Doll Manufacturing Inc According to a survey last year of parents who purchased the Elkie our most popular doll 90 percent reported that although their children were extremely satisfied with the doll 73
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 66
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 73
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1473 1500
No. of Different Words: 163 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.062 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.591 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.9 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.476 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.287 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.36 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...health, but will it be healthier for us also. Years ago, lifestyle was completely di...
^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... any evidence about such medical claim. As per statement it is highly nutrient. So...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...So, Will it be beneficial for everyone. As every human body has different digestio...
^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...specially for non-vegetarian because is a animal bone broth. Further, Proponent C...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 55.5748502994 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 290.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22068965517 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72256611135 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.468620217663 124% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.8473053892 57% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1358621455 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0952380952 119.503703932 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8095238095 23.324526521 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 5.70786347227 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233490757213 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062719211167 0.0743258471296 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560309031438 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162159904716 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619725319137 0.0628817314937 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.3550499002 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.1389221557 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.