People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
There are various factors that determine people’s attitudes. Some people insist that societal rules and common sense have a stronger impact on how we think and behave over individuals’ personal situations. However, I do not agree with this opinion. I believe that an individual's personal situations are greater contributors than societal situations in determining one’s attitudes for the following reasons.
Firstly, people are not interested in social issues if they are unrelated to them. The phenomenon that people seem to be sensitively affected by social issues occurs only if the issues have a significant impact on them. In other words, when only a societal situation changes individuals’ immediate situation, they react to the stimulation and adapt their attitudes. On the other hand, if a societal situation is less related to individuals, they are more likely to ignore them. This is because changing attitudes is not an easy job, requiring a lot of effort. This demonstrates that individuals’ situations have stronger power in determining their behaviors when compared to societal situations.
Secondly, during suffering from personal problems, we are restricted to think and behave within them. For instance, when we face a personal crisis, such as being broken up with a boyfriend, we will be busy enough to be sad or upset, unable to consider whatever happens in our society. In that situation, the advent of a new social movement cannot change one’s mind or behaviors, but only one’s current situation will dominate them. Thus, I insist that societal issues will not be able to be more influential than individuals’ issues in determining one’s attitudes.
It is not true that social situations do not affect determining people’s attitudes. However, when compared to the effect of individuals’ situations, they have less influence as I abovementioned. Therefore, I would like to support the suggested opinion.
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 60
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 62
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...agree with this opinion. I believe that an individuals personal situations are greater contrib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 302.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45364238411 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12232693447 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509933774834 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9717313928 57.8364921388 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.70786347227 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213380217043 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748438549519 0.0743258471296 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705893901683 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1374795508 0.128457276422 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568567846154 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...agree with this opinion. I believe that an individuals personal situations are greater contrib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 302.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45364238411 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12232693447 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509933774834 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9717313928 57.8364921388 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.70786347227 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213380217043 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748438549519 0.0743258471296 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705893901683 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1374795508 0.128457276422 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568567846154 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.