A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The pet food company asserts that the pet food manufactured by the company is not responsible for the vomiting, lethargy and other signs of illness to the pet. The pet food company tested the chemicals and posits thatm the chemicals are approved for use in pet food. But there are several assumptions being made which needs to addressed before coming to any conclusion.
Firstly, the company tested the samples from the recalled food and just checked whether the chemicals are approved for the use in the pet food. It might be that, even if these chemicals are approved for the pet food due to factors such as storage, weather conditions, environment there is some reactions happening in the chemicals which causes lethargy,vomiting to the tests. So the company must test all possible factors and not just the chemicals used.
Secondly, the statement mentions that the company performed tests on the recalled food. The question here is that, whether the tests performed are full proof and unbiased. As the company's reputation is at stake it might be that the company manipulated the results just to maintain their reputation in the business.
Finally, the company just tested their pet food but it might be the case that the problem take place when their pet food is mixed water or milk. As the pet food contained chemicals, it is a possibility that mixing the pet food with water or milk gave rise to chemical reactions which in turn led to problems to the pet. It is also possible pet food has no problems but the way in which the food is packed and stored is not proper which lead to this problem.
To sum up, the company must perform the tests considering all the factors which may be directly or indirectly involved before arriving at any conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 49 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 65 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | farhadmoqimi | 29 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Prudhvi6054 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | solankis304 | 29 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 54
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 63
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject. 73
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/pet-food-company-r…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 305 350
No. of Characters: 1425 1500
No. of Different Words: 136 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.179 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.672 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.442 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 91 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.462 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.51 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.442 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.683 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some reactions'?
Suggestion: there are some reactions
...torage, weather conditions, environment there is some reactions happening in the chemicals which causes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vomiting
...g in the chemicals which causes lethargy,vomiting to the tests. So the company must test ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... performed are full proof and unbiased. As the companys reputation is at stake it ...
^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
... mixing the pet food with water or milk gave rise to chemical reactions which in tur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 304.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58216769938 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 204.123752495 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457236842105 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1398250738 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 5.70786347227 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513604498479 0.218282227539 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224765628448 0.0743258471296 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17792468415 0.0701772020484 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289675886563 0.128457276422 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166021610164 0.0628817314937 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 98.500998004 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.