A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;">The text states that a pet food company recalled four million pounds of its products after a rise of illness signs in animals which had eaten them. By further investigation and analysis, they found that all the standards </span>are satisfied<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> and there are no chemicals in the food, so they do not have more responsibility for the issue. Although at first glance, the scenario seems rational, deeper pursuing the situation shows some flaws in the write-up.
To begin, the author mentioned that the company recalled the products to test some samples from them. It is worthy to notice that there is no clear evidence that it is customary that a court investigates the claims and </span>complaints<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> of the customer. Why was the company eligible to announce the healthiness of the product? It is strange that a company recall foods for more investigation.
Moreover, the author argued that the company tested samples from the recalled food and determined all the chemicals </span>were approved<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;">. He did not offer any evidence to corroborate</span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> the claim that whether the number of samples tested in the company was enough to prove the claim or not. There </span>should be<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> more statistical laws defined to show how many samples are suitable </span>to be<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> the representative of </span>the whole<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> four million pounds of the food. If the samples which tested are less than the required number, then the conclusion entirely encountered flaws. Plus, there is no further information about the </span>expiration<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> date of the chemicals used in the foods; the writing just argued about the type of the substances, not their quality.
Finally, which organisation or law approve the company assertion and declared results? People should trust the outcome and conclusion of the analysis of the company and what would happen if people want to follow their complaint further?
All in all, the author should glean more evidence and data about this event to enhance</span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, system-ui, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15.75px;"> the accuracy of the narrated story.</span>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 49 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 65 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | farhadmoqimi | 29 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Prudhvi6054 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | solankis304 | 29 | view |
- TPO 49 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reaso 73
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 63
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- TPO 5 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO 28 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 643 350
No. of Characters: 3429 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.036 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.333 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.746 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 241 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 184 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 143 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 117 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 21.815 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.527 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.688 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.248 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3983.0 2260.96107784 176% => OK
No of words: 543.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 7.33517495396 5.12650576532 143% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.46198492949 2.78398813304 160% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.36832412523 0.468620217663 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1047.6 705.55239521 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59920159681 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 225.543038514 57.8364921388 390% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 265.533333333 119.503703932 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 36.2 23.324526521 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.70786347227 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064988136159 0.218282227539 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620902975065 0.0743258471296 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707279710063 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641536195526 0.128457276422 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443860234527 0.0628817314937 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.2 14.3799401198 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 9.56 48.3550499002 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.1628742515 204% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.9 12.197005988 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 25.88 12.5979740519 205% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 32.5 12.3882235529 262% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.9071856287 218% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.