A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The statement was made on several unwarranted assumptions. I will discuss a few of them in detail
For One, details on pets that can use this product is unclear, How often pets can be fed. these details were unclear to understand whether there was only a particular set of pets that were reactive to this product or there are several other reasons behind this complaints. questions on are the feeding instructions communicated properly to ensure pets are not over fed and cause reactions. Irresponsible feeding during irregular intervals might affect the food cycle causing illness.
Nonetheless, there are questions on the entity that approved pet food. The test environment was unclear. testing agency's approvals can make the case more clear. No research data was published with regards to the concerns and complaints received from customers about the food. To understand are these symptoms harmful, periodic, and pertinent to few species? Batch number of the production to be checked upon to understand if there is any process flaw that caused this mishap.
Furthermore, it is a known fact that external environments affect the way pets behave. Cross-breed pets attract a lot of attention from masses, which are very sensitive to external conditions. Nutrition and environmental conditions are to be conditioned for their survival. is it only during particular time of the season this complaints were noted has to be looked onto?
In conclusion, the statement is being challenged due to lack of information on pets that were tested. Chemicals that might cause reactions in particular species, environmental conditions in which tests were conducted and approving body for this product.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
2022-09-30 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 58 | view |
2022-07-21 | gewkimrtnabovwtejo | 23 | view |
2022-07-20 | gewkimrtnabovwtejo | 58 | view |
2022-06-22 | Nalu00 | 83 | view |
- The diagram shows the making of icecream processing 1
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 75
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situarion How to improve it 56
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 83
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 57
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 268 350
No. of Characters: 1391 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.046 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.19 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.865 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 100 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.05 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.357 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.585 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... is unclear, How often pets can be fed. these details were unclear to understand whet...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... there are several other reasons behind this complaints. questions on are the feedin...
^^^^
Line 8, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Questions
...l other reasons behind this complaints. questions on are the feeding instructions communi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Testing
...food. The test environment was unclear. testing agencys approvals can make the case mor...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 343, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...mptoms harmful, periodic, and pertinent to few species? Batch number of the produc...
^^
Line 18, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aused this mishap. Furthermore, it is a known fact that external environ...
^^
Line 18, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
...e to be conditioned for their survival. is it only during particular time of the s...
^^
Line 18, column 324, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ly during particular time of the season this complaints were noted has to be looked ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, nonetheless, so, as to, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 268.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44776119403 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93997649574 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.468620217663 126% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6419138201 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8823529412 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 23.324526521 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.70786347227 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198814215945 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065685403378 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696029564315 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995019941468 0.128457276422 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661625854772 0.0628817314937 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.