Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, the population should not return to the levels before the fishing boats arrived. Because this trend is expected to continue over the next several years, the Madagascan shrimp will quickly become an endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument writer shows his concerns that Madagascan shrimp will become an endangered species over several years. The argument is trying to establish that this situation will be caused solely due to the incursions by dep-sea fishermen. However it fails to provide certain evidences to make it truly compelling argument.
Before put any blame on the recent incursion , we need to consider what was the last year's situation. How many number of Madagascan shrimps were present at that time and after incrsion. Was the recent incursion committied with large number comparing with past years? If it's true then by how many numbers it is greater than previous years. After this year's incursion how many Madagascan shrimp is available now ? From past statistics we need to know also what is the average increase in Madagascan shrimp during the breeding season. We need all these staistics from recent and past history. Also this is very important to know that if there is any other reason which eventually decreases the number of Madagascan shrimps. Until , unless we get to know if incursion is the only factor of reduction of Madagascan shrimp we can not make it sole reason for Madagascan shrimp reduction.
In conclusion , above mentioned statistics are necessary as evidence to judge if incursion is responsible for reduction in Madagascan shrimp and if responsible then by what factor it is influenced and if it is the sole reason of this reduction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Deepanshu Dewangan | 37 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | bharadwaj98 | 65 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | solankis304 | 23 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | aneela | 23 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 58 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 23
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 33
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...to the incursions by dep-sea fishermen. However it fails to provide certain evidences t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re put any blame on the recent incursion , we need to consider what was the last y...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
..., we need to consider what was the last years situation. How many number of Madagasca...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
... what was the last years situation. How many number of Madagascan shrimps were present at t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...large number comparing with past years? If its true then by how many numbers it is...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...greater than previous years. After this years incursion how many Madagascan shrimp is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...staistics from recent and past history. Also this is very important to know that if ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the number of Madagascan shrimps. Until , unless we get to know if incursion is t...
^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ascan shrimp reduction. In conclusion , above mentioned statistics are necessar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 239.0 441.139720559 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07531380753 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7061798484 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 204.123752495 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543933054393 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 705.55239521 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3896101264 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3076923077 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.70786347227 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249184829212 0.218282227539 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907097694402 0.0743258471296 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515883944904 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145712886954 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564949781298 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 98.500998004 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.