Saliclytes
In this argument, the experts conclude that residents of Mentia will suffer fewer headaches in future. To justify the claim, the arguers cite the plan to use Salicylates, which belongs to the same family as apirin the medicine for treating headaches, as a food additive. However, this argument is flawed by a series of groundless assumptions, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands.
First of all, the argument rests of the assumption that Salicylates will have the exact effect as Aspirin. However the arguer does not take into account that belonging to the same chemical family does not automatically mean that chemicals will have the same effects. Though it is true that chemicals from the same family have many similar properties, there are never exactly the same. It is possible that Aspirin may be an effective headache remedy due to its unique properties which may not be possessed by Salicylates. Salicylates may be ineffective in treating headaches because it lacks the unique properties possessed by the Aspirin. to put the argument on a more sound footing, the arguers must demonstrate, that Salicylates possesses the properties that are essential for it to be used as a headache reliever.
The argument also credits the reduction of headaches to Saliclyates. The conclusion that the decline in headaches is as a result of the rise in use of Salicylates suggests an assumption that Salicylates may be responsible for the downward trend, which is in all likelihood not the case. Given that headaches can be caused and prevented in many ways.better medication, health consciousness can contribute to the reduction of headaches. It is possible that the decline can be attributed to other effective medications. it is also possible that the population is now more conscious of the causes of headaches than before and have taken the right measures to prevent headaches, hence the noticeable. to Substantiate the claim, the expert must provide data that proves that the decrease in cases of headaches is as a result of an increase in use of Salicylates.
Finally, the argument unfairly assumes that using Saliclyates as a food additive will further reduce headaches. yet the experts fails to provide evidence to prove it. It is entirely possible that Saliclytes has no medicinal properties and will have no effects at all on people with headaches. A more complete understanding on the benefits of Saliclytes will be helpful. to substantiate the claims, the arguer should provide data that shows the medical properties of Saliclytes.
In Conclusion, the argument rests on unproven claims that Saliclytes will have the same affects as Aspirin because they belong to the same chemical family and that using it as a food additive will further reduce headache cases. More data needs to be provided to show that indeed Saliclytes has the same properties as Aspirin to be used as a headache reliever too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Andrewbanda70 | 53 | view |
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 476 350
No. of Characters: 2388 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.671 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.017 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.867 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 180 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 146 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 111 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 73 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.08 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.356 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.595 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s of Mentia will suffer fewer headaches in future. To justify the claim, the arguers cite...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... will have the exact effect as Aspirin. However the arguer does not take into account t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sames'?
Suggestion: sames
...properties, there are never exactly the same. It is possible that Aspirin may be an ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ue properties possessed by the Aspirin. to put the argument on a more sound footin...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot the case. Given that headaches can be caused and prevented in many ways.better...
^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ributed to other effective medications. it is also possible that the population is...
^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...revent headaches, hence the noticeable. to Substantiate the claim, the expert must...
^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...additive will further reduce headaches. yet the experts fails to provide evidence ...
^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itive will further reduce headaches. yet the experts fails to provide evidence to...
^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...benefits of Saliclytes will be helpful. to substantiate the claims, the arguer sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 476.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13235294118 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95425886983 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424369747899 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9911946486 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.045454545 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879940570994 0.218282227539 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335519023307 0.0743258471296 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738622167875 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727139883656 0.128457276422 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891555483508 0.0628817314937 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.