Schools should do more to prepare students for non-academic adulthood
The statement that schools should prepare the children not only for academics, but also to the adulthood of having different scenarios, clearly addresses the current trend of having high importance on academics rather than giving a proper and fully fledged personality to the children. The schools are only concentrating on making the children dream about high paying scale and a facile career. This is restricting children from developing the ability to face challenges that may come in their way in life. Having said that, there is no value for the moral education as well as any other non-academic aspects of life that children might have to face in their adulthood.
In this concern, Japan has the most interesting type of schooling when compared to other countries. It gives children in the school age the glimpse of responsibility, cleaning their environment, household works such as cooking, cleaning and also the trading the food they had cooked. These aspects make the kids have a sense of how adulthood would be and what are things they need to concentrate on besides scoring well in academics. This gives the true meaning of education in all aspects.
In contrast to this statement and example, there are schools which do not even give attention to the mental health and the overall development of the child. They would be so much into making them score well in the subjects that might give them the highest salary and fame. This mindset of the schools are leading to the increasing mental health issues in a very young age of the children.
However, the government could also take in some responsibilities in imposing the non-curricular activities to the institutions which only concentrate on academics, ruling out the possibilities of having producing adults who wouldn’t have any idea about how to face life and its challenges. This concern has lead the education world into a deep thinking of changing the methods of current teaching and preparing the kids for the future.
In adulthood it becomes most important that how we lead our life rather than what scores do we have on our profile or scorecards. Life never comes with lessons, teachings or instructions. So, if we depend only on the way we learn our academics i.e, by learning and memorizing, we lead to nowhere but to destruction. This attitude should be built in every individual from young age while they have their schooling. The schools have better chances of molding the children into the desired shapes. This works well with children when they are guided in a public environment with their peers, instead of telling them in private in homes.
Therefore, it is a very serious concern that schools should prepare the kids in such a way that they should be capable of leading their life flawlessly without hesitating to take challenges and actions. This is possible only when they are taught non-academic concepts like moral values, life aspects, facing challenges, daily life activities along with their curriculum/academics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en they are taught non-academic concepts like moral values, life aspects, facing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in contrast, such as, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11267605634 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84684004058 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482897384306 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5988257896 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195474767226 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576988129239 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544389965686 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106179900834 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518360571845 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.