In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fish -
ing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through
the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department
devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years
there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river’s water
and the river’s smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean
up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is, therefore, sure to increase. The
city government should for that reason devote more money in this year’s budget to
riverside recreational facilities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of
the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions
and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The argue could be summarized as, riverside recreational favorite activities of Mason city people is limited along Mason river sides due to the river's water bad smell and poor water quality. Thus, the government could devote sufficient amount of money for riverside recreational facilities. The arguement is based on some of author's assumptions.
For instance, the author assumed that Mason city park devoted budjet in order to maintain riverside recreational facilities was not enough. However, this assumption is not based on any evidence especially about the amount of maintiance works and the amount of the devoted money, this assumption if proved to be true, the author's argument would be ultimatly supported. Perhaps, the maintenance process required heavy equipements work and a futher operations studies, which need a huge amount of financial support.
Furthermore, the author assumed that Mason city people water sports, such as swimming, boating abd fishing, activities could increase by maintaining the river and cleaning it's poor quality water. Maybe these kind of sports are prefer to be performed on sea side by Mason city people. Thus, the author's argument could be weaken if this assumption prove is unwarranted.
Moreover, the author's assumed that the government has a sufficient financial strength to support secondary issues as a kind of sports popularity rather than a higher importance issues as medical care for serious diseases and enhacing economy by devoting more money to build industerial factories. Thus, the author's desire would be weaken. Whereas, the government do not have such financial availability to such kind of maintinance at the current year.
These previously illustrated assumptions is an example of a set of assiumptions that could be investigated in order to validate the argument properly as these assumptions could either bolster or weaken the arguement and the author's conclusion as well.
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs inthat field. 66
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years mostof the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had becomeextinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, bec 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, orscientists, but the general wellbeingof all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. Indeveloping an 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wit the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- “Studying foodways—what foods people eat and how they produce, acquire, prepare, andconsume them—is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture.”Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing andsupporti 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The arguement is based on some of author's assumptions.
Error: arguement Suggestion: argument
Sentence: For instance, the author assumed that Mason city park devoted budjet in order to maintain riverside recreational facilities was not enough.
Error: budjet Suggestion: budget
Sentence: However, this assumption is not based on any evidence especially about the amount of maintiance works and the amount of the devoted money, this assumption if proved to be true, the author's argument would be ultimatly supported.
Error: ultimatly Suggestion: ultimately
Error: maintiance Suggestion: maintenance
Sentence: Perhaps, the maintenance process required heavy equipements work and a futher operations studies, which need a huge amount of financial support.
Error: equipements Suggestion: equipment
Error: futher Suggestion: father
Sentence: Furthermore, the author assumed that Mason city people water sports, such as swimming, boating abd fishing, activities could increase by maintaining the river and cleaning it's poor quality water.
Error: abd Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Thus, the author's argument could be weaken if this assumption prove is unwarranted.
Error: unwarranted Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Moreover, the author's assumed that the government has a sufficient financial strength to support secondary issues as a kind of sports popularity rather than a higher importance issues as medical care for serious diseases and enhacing economy by devoting more money to build industerial factories.
Error: industerial Suggestion: industrial
Error: enhacing Suggestion: enhancing
Sentence: Whereas, the government do not have such financial availability to such kind of maintinance at the current year.
Error: maintinance Suggestion: maintenance
Sentence: These previously illustrated assumptions is an example of a set of assiumptions that could be investigated in order to validate the argument properly as these assumptions could either bolster or weaken the arguement and the author's conclusion as well.
Error: arguement Suggestion: argument
Error: assiumptions Suggestion: assumptions
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 12 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 300 350
No. of Characters: 1610 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.162 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.367 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.861 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.625 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.379 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.626 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The argue could be summarized as, rivers...
^^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The argue could be summarized as, riverside recre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...long Mason river sides due to the rivers water bad smell and poor water quality. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ased on some of authors assumptions. For instance, the author assumed that Ma...
^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...is assumption if proved to be true, the authors argument would be ultimatly supported. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a huge amount of financial support. Furthermore, the author assumed that Mas...
^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... cleaning its poor quality water. Maybe these kind of sports are prefer to be performed on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...y water. Maybe these kind of sports are prefer to be performed on sea side by Mason ci...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ea side by Mason city people. Thus, the authors argument could be weaken if this assump...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his assumption prove is unwarranted. Moreover, the authors assumed that the g...
^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...us, the authors desire would be weaken. Whereas, the government do not have such financ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of maintinance at the current year. These previously illustrated assumptions...
^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...bolster or weaken the arguement and the authors conclusion as well.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 300.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49666666667 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90734510431 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8718945242 57.8364921388 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188687705599 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726956355759 0.0743258471296 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904145508682 0.0701772020484 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113704707139 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829546978892 0.0628817314937 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.