The author’s central claim is that the disappearance of the western gazelle in East Palean Preserve (EPP) could not possibly have been caused by the “slight reduction in rainfall” compared to the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve (WPWP) where the western gazelle originates from, but that instead it must have been caused by the larger number of predators in the EPP compared to the WPWP.
There are a bunch of evidence that can be gathered, that might weaken the author’s argument. For one, biologists should test if there are differences in what plants the eastern and western gazelle eat....
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton. 66
- Three years ago because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve an area that is home to most of the same species that are found in the western preserve though in larger 83
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res 83
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res 66
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 66
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
flaws:
also need to talk about 100 lions from the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve.
other arguments:
all animals may experience decline, but east has big amount, while there are only 300 for western.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 534 350
No. of Characters: 2571 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.807 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.815 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.411 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 191 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 152 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.33 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.353 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.54 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
What are the most obvious
What are the most obvious things to improve to get at least a 5?
1. there are some warning
1. there are some warning messages like:
Unique words percentage: 0.419172932331 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
it means the languages can be polished.
2. there are still some flaws which leave rooms to improve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bunches'?
Suggestion: bunches
... EPP compared to the WPWP. There are a bunch of evidence that can be gathered, that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, well, whereas, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.6327345309 168% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.9520958084 193% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2722.0 2260.96107784 120% => OK
No of words: 532.0 441.139720559 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11654135338 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7791237372 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419172932331 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 818.1 705.55239521 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.67365269461 478% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.2000506068 57.8364921388 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.619047619 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194299601195 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718564379891 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062929021812 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129482657073 0.128457276422 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357177666821 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.