Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty.
Real estate is an emerging business field. Different experts judge the success of a real estate firm on different factors. The kind of land or house sold, the kind of business or purpose that land will be used for in the future, how good do the economic gains hold in long term, and numerous such factors are responsible for a company's success in this area.
First, the author's assumption that Adams Realty is superior than Fitch Realty because Adams Realty has some more employees than Fitch, and that Adams has more full time employees than Fitch may not hold true for all companies. There are clear cut examples of firms that survive only on freelance talent, rather than people working in regular nine to five jobs.
Secondly, the author assumes that because Adams Realty has had more sales last year than Fitch Realty, which only points out the quantitative success of Adams, and that too, in the previous year. Moreover, the author argues that because Adams sold more in homes, Adams is better. It is highly probable that Fitch sales were more related to large scale projects, maybe to contractors and government, or are marginally smaller than Adams sales.
The author finally assumes that because he or she was able to sell his house more quickly currently with Fitch, anyone would find Adams faster, may not hold for all general cases. Also, the two houses were sold at an interval of approximately a decade, which weakens his argument.
Thus, the author's argument is flawed because of multiple unwarranted assumptions that may not hold at all. An advertisement or advice that carries this argument may persuade people to shift to Adams without much strong reason. It also further indirectly weakens the position that Filch may have in the real estate market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | sapana | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | stevewang1007 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | siirsalvador | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | suhas201227 | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | mehdi2020 | 63 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nys success in this area. First, the authors assumption that Adams Realty is superio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...ssumption that Adams Realty is superior than Fitch Realty because Adams Realty has s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ees than Fitch, and that Adams has more full time employees than Fitch may not hold true ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hich weakens his argument. Thus, the authors argument is flawed because of multiple ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256024096386 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.135542168675 0.15541462614 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0963855421687 0.0836205057962 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0843373493976 0.0520304965353 162% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0180722891566 0.0272364105082 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129518072289 0.125424944231 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0180722891566 0.0416121511921 43% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.32588095616 2.79052419416 83% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0180722891566 0.026700313972 68% => OK
Particles: 0.00301204819277 0.001811407834 166% => OK
Determiners: 0.0873493975904 0.113004496875 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210843373494 0.0255425247493 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150602409639 0.0127820249294 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1776.0 2731.13054187 65% => OK
No of words: 300.0 446.07635468 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346666666667 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.13 0.208842608468 62% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0733333333333 0.135150697306 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32588095616 2.79052419416 83% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 207.018472906 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.469332199767 119% => OK
Word variations: 58.9150514118 52.1807786196 113% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0769230769 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4069867715 57.7814097925 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.615384615 141.986410481 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.724660767414 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 48.0769230769 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.69620253165 1.8405768891 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368088395053 0.441005458295 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118021177982 0.135418324435 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0592185679864 0.0829849096947 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591048299139 0.58762219726 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152839307092 0.147661913831 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143703128431 0.193483328276 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977963171825 0.0970749176394 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.276096626617 0.42659136922 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.11602630816 0.0774707102158 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21478284662 0.312017818177 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950198410268 0.0698173142475 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 14.657635468 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.