The author argument is based on the fact that the residents near by West Egg's landfill are heavily concentrating towards the recycling of aluminum and paper. Over 90% of respondents on the survey are certain that they will continue and even increase to recycling as the garbage pickup will double the charges. Because of this recycling the prediction made by consultants two years ago, that in five years West Egg's landfill will be completely filled will no longer hold true. Looking at the facts and the way they are presented it is believable that argument has strong point but however it is not persuasive as it is based on assumptions and doesn't have supported evidence.
First and foremost, the prediction that came out from the two consultants, were on the basis of any lab or on field experiment which they performed? Does the statistical report of the prediction has any proof which states that in coming 5 years West Egg's landfill will be filled up? Predictions are always based upon the historical data.
-How many number of features were considered while predicting?
-How many years of historical data was taken into account?
-At various time periods (over years), was the capacity of landfill considered?
-How much percent of population growth in the town was considered?
Secondly, author mentions that in past two years town residents have been recycling the waste twice as much as they did in previous years. It is assuming that town is recycling the waste for many years then was this fact taken into account while prediction. Argument states that in next month the recycling will be increased further , on what basis will this happen? Do we have any graph or evidence stating that every month the recycling increases when charges of garbage pickup increases? if not , this statement was also an assumption. For example, next month recycle rate might go down and in next to next it might go increase steeply giving out a steady/stable result for these two months.
Furtherly, author states, a recent survey said that residents would do more recycling in the future. Any past survey whose results can evidently show that residents committing to a cause will actually reflect in their actions, will be helpful here. Survey says residents will increase recycling , only aluminum and paper or will there be some other material which will be recycled because more or less total garbage having aluminum and paper will remain same and in order to increase recycling, which other material will be recycled by them.
In addition to this , migration of population is a normal habit observed in any town. What is the guarantee or who will be responsible enough to make sure that the new residents coming in will be following and be committed to this cause. This is assumed that new families coming in will be recycling the waste.
Conclusion, lab or on field experiments of landfill which will act as evidence for the prediction made by two consultants will be needed to better analyze. Give out the report which answers the questions about features, historical data, population of town considered, to cross verify the facts. Town might be recycling the waste for many years, was this scenario taken into account? Proof that town residents will abide by their commitment of recycling, will be helpful to rule out this is an assumption. Are residents considering to recycle any other material than aluminum and paper in order to increase the recycling of waste.
- Two years ago our consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past two years however town residents have been recycling twice as much aluminum and paper as they 77
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company quot According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 58
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 54
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 83
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...is based on the fact that the residents near by West Eggs landfill are heavily concentr...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 577, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...lievable that argument has strong point but however it is not persuasive as it is based on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 644, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...asive as it is based on assumptions and doesnt have supported evidence. First and for...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...s based upon the historical data. -How many number of features were considered while predi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the recycling will be increased further , on what basis will this happen? Do we h...
^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...en charges of garbage pickup increases? if not , this statement was also an assump...
^^
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rges of garbage pickup increases? if not , this statement was also an assumption. ...
^^
Line 8, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y says residents will increase recycling , only aluminum and paper or will there b...
^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e recycled by them. In addition to this , migration of population is a normal hab...
^^
Line 10, column 519, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering recycling'.
Suggestion: considering recycling
...ut this is an assumption. Are residents considering to recycle any other material than aluminum and pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in addition, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.6327345309 194% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.9520958084 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 55.5748502994 131% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2891.0 2260.96107784 128% => OK
No of words: 581.0 441.139720559 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97590361446 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61271636417 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 204.123752495 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435456110155 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.0 705.55239521 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8636131518 57.8364921388 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.70786347227 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 5.15768463074 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343977908129 0.218282227539 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981177385896 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900664789296 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137459740452 0.128457276422 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956493757394 0.0628817314937 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...is based on the fact that the residents near by West Eggs landfill are heavily concentr...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 577, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...lievable that argument has strong point but however it is not persuasive as it is based on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 644, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...asive as it is based on assumptions and doesnt have supported evidence. First and for...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...s based upon the historical data. -How many number of features were considered while predi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the recycling will be increased further , on what basis will this happen? Do we h...
^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...en charges of garbage pickup increases? if not , this statement was also an assump...
^^
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rges of garbage pickup increases? if not , this statement was also an assumption. ...
^^
Line 8, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y says residents will increase recycling , only aluminum and paper or will there b...
^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e recycled by them. In addition to this , migration of population is a normal hab...
^^
Line 10, column 519, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering recycling'.
Suggestion: considering recycling
...ut this is an assumption. Are residents considering to recycle any other material than aluminum and pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in addition, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.6327345309 194% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.9520958084 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 55.5748502994 131% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2891.0 2260.96107784 128% => OK
No of words: 581.0 441.139720559 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97590361446 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61271636417 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 204.123752495 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435456110155 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.0 705.55239521 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8636131518 57.8364921388 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.70786347227 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 5.15768463074 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343977908129 0.218282227539 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981177385896 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900664789296 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137459740452 0.128457276422 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956493757394 0.0628817314937 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.