Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
The following is taken from the editorial section of the local newspaper in Rockingham.
"In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably accommodate the number of people who are employed by the town. In addition, it is very costly to heat the old hall in winter and cool it in summer. The new, larger building would be more energy efficient, costing less per square foot to heat and cool than the old hall. Furthermore, it would be possible to rent out some of the space in the new building, thereby generating income for the town of Rockingham."
People generally would like to make use of newer stuffs, from scale of home to city and etc. In this topic, writer thinks replacing old hall by new building will be more energy efficient. This claim is somehow true but there are some cases that should be investigated.
Designing and constructing new building needs money, worker, and many other resources. As the writer declares, the most weakness of old hall is not being energy efficient. Designing an energy efficient building needs expert designers and if will cost a lot.
Energy has many types, the writer doesn’t mention exactly which types of energy are using ineffective in old town hall. So that they could just change those specific energy systems instead of destroying whole building. For example if this building is wasting cool and heat, the cool and heat systems can substituted by new systems. This will cost more times less than constructing new building.
Another point of view is to clear the age of old town hall. If it has been built about 5 years ago, It means it takes enough cost for these years and replacing it with new building would waste a huge amount of money.
Furthermore destroying a building and constructing a new one may have effect on traffic and peoples living and etc.
- "The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors: "Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satell 30
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' job than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' job. 70
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 65
- Argument Topic: The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:"The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. The sa 30
flaws:
No. of Words: 218 350
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ?
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 218 350
No. of Characters: 1017 1500
No. of Different Words: 133 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.843 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.665 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.393 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.151 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.647 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5