The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:
"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlands has been prohibited. Now local development interests are lobbying for the West Lansburg council to allow an access road to be built along the edge of wetlands. Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria, which had a similar sanctuary, has seen its sea otter population decline since the repeal of its sanctuary status in 1978. In order to preserve the region's biodiversity and ensure a healthy environment, the West Lansburg council should not allow the road to be built."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author in the given letter addressed to the editor is of the view that allowing construction activities along the edge of the wetlands would be a threat to the tufted groundhogs living in the sanctuary. Possibly the authors analysis is correct but it needs more specific evidence to bolster its view and convince the council to void the construction.
It has been pointed out that the groundhog's population in the historic times was once in millions. It would be best if an evidence could be provided that it was due to human interference that their population saw an decrease until the wetlands were declared as a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 and which ultimately lead to a positive impact on the groundhog community.
The author mentions one similar instance of Eastern Carpenteria, where the sanctuary status was repealed which lead to a decline in the sea otter population in the area. However, it has not been clearly mentioned if the cause of the decrease was humans, climatic conditions or other environmental or health related issues. Moreover, the sanctuary status being repealed could have lead to hunting or poaching activities. It is not mentioned in the letter that the Wetland's sanctuary status would be changed, so such an impact could be improbable.
The author also needs to evaluate the consequences of not building a link road along the edge of the wetands. It might be possible that it is essential for the council for the economic prospects and public interest. Hence due consideration needs to be put on that matter.
Thus, providing the aforementioned evidences would strengthen the authors argument and take the council into its confidence to not allow the road construction along the edge of the wetlands and hence save the area's biodiversity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-22 | soumyamukhija | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Since we are famou 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 88
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 58
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 75
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe 40
Sentence: Thus, providing the aforementioned evidences would strengthen the authors argument and take the council into its confidence to not allow the road construction along the edge of the wetlands and hence save the area's biodiversity.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to authors and argument
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a negator
Suggestion: Refer to to and not
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 294 350
For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 294 350
No. of Characters: 1458 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.141 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.959 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.821 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.845 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.655 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5