Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Teachers are groups of noble who dedicate a life time to service to mankind. Teachers are the creators of future generation.Policy makers should always give them adequate compensation so that we can have bright professionals in the teaching profession.
If teacher’s salaries were to be based on the academic performance of the students we would require a standardized testing procedure. Common standardized tests like SAT usually test for vocabulary, reading comprehension and mathematics. In this case we will not be able to decide on the compensation of teachers who teach specialized subjects like anthropology, geography etc. Moreover it will be a very contentious issue how a geography teacher will compare to a physics teacher as not all subjects have the same difficulty level.
The student’s answer scripts are graded by the teachers themselves. So attaching teacher’s compensation to the student’s grade is virtually like teachers deciding on their own compensation. This will lead to teachers unjustly awarding better marks to students to increase their compensation. Experts might argue that different set of teachers should grade answer scripts of students taught by another teacher, but this is case of colleagues deciding on compensation. So there will cases of corruption and bribery.
Different teachers teach students with different levels of ability. Intellect level of all students is not the same. A poor teacher might get a set of very intelligent and hard working students, so he will easily get a good compensation. A good teacher might get student who are not so intelligent so despite his hard work he might get a lower compensation.
Teaching is noble profession so to attach grades to compensation is disparaging on the profession. If at all a teacher’s compensation is based on the performance a lot of factors should be taken into consideration. Student’s grade should not be the only criteria.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-05 | nilka61 | 83 | view |
2013-09-17 | maryam2900 | 51 | view |
2013-08-31 | JackoMany MasteroSome | 70 | view |
2013-08-12 | gshankar20 | 75 | view |
2013-07-29 | A.R.Ramya | 68 | view |
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.Discuss the extent to 65
- Group #1: Analysis of ArgumentTThe following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses: Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furn 60
- Davis Technologies, a computer-chip maker, could solve its problem of declining sales by dropping its prices. This would make Davis better able to compete in the highly competitive computer chip market. The sales of chips would increase and this would sub 65
- A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow specialized study of a single discipline Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned 57
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 55
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 306 350
No. of Characters: 1594 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.209 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.085 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.335 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.168 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5