"Twenty years ago Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is false, and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid. Because they are using the interview-centered method, my team of graduate students working in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures."
Whether observation or interview is important when conducting a study has always been an area of search among scientists for decades. In the preceding statement, the author claims that Dr. Field`s observation- centered approach to studying cultures is invalid, and interview-centered method will prove a more accurate understanding if child -rearing traditions in island cultures. Though his claim may well have merit, the author presents a poorly reasoned argument. Based on several questionable premises and assumptions, and based on the evidence the author offers, we cannot accept his argument as...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-28 | piyushac123 | 80 | view |
| 2021-06-04 | wurstkopf123 | view | |
| 2021-01-30 | uwaiseibna | view | |
| 2020-05-10 | shubhamaggarwal | 81 | view |
| 2013-11-08 | manshu | 67 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today 75
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity. 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 74
- Analysis of ArgumentThe following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant: It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire c 95
- source of innovation,whether it depends on individuals or a group 60
Sentence: For example, if many children were surveyed but only children from other islands except Tertian responded, the conclusion that children spend much more time talking abouttheir biological parents than about other adults would be highly suspected.
Description: A noun, singular, common is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to abouttheir and biological
Sentence: The authors premises, the basis for his argument, lack any legitimate evidentary support and render his conclusion unaccepted.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to authors and premises
Sentence: Even if children spend much time speaking about their biological parents. it does not follow that they werent reared by an entire village.
Description: A pronoun, personal, nominative, not 3rd person singular is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to they and werent
Sentence: Without ruling out these and other possible factorsthat give rise to case, the author cannot confidently conclude that interview-centered method is more accurate to understand child-rearing traditions.
Description: The fragment factorsthat give rise is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace give with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Sentence: While the author does have several key issues in his arguments premises and assumptions, that is not to say that the entire argument is without base.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to arguments and premises
Sentence: If the author hopes to change his readers minds on the issue, he would have to largely restructure his argument, fix the flaws in his logic, clearly explicate his assumptions, and provide evidentiary support.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to readers and minds
Sentence: Lacking ingormation about the number of children surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to assess the validity of the results.
Error: ingormation Suggestion: information
Sentence: For example, if many children were surveyed but only children from other islands except Tertian responded, the conclusion that children spend much more time talking abouttheir biological parents than about other adults would be highly suspected.
Error: abouttheir Suggestion: about their
Sentence: Even if children spend much time speaking about their biological parents. it does not follow that they werent reared by an entire village.
Error: werent Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Besides, the arguerdoes not provide any solid information concerning what kind of interview he conducted and what kind of questions he asked.
Error: arguerdoes Suggestion: argue does
Sentence: Without ruling out these and other possible factorsthat give rise to case, the author cannot confidently conclude that interview-centered method is more accurate to understand child-rearing traditions.
Error: interview-centered Suggestion: interview centered
Error: child-rearing Suggestion: child rearing
Error: factorsthat Suggestion: factors that
Sentence: Providing information about what kind of study he conducted and what kind of questions he asked and showing that respondents were represantatives of all children, he could improve his argument significantly.
Error: represantatives Suggestion: representatives
Sentence: In sum, the authors illogical argument is based on unsupported presimes and unsubstantiated assumptoins that render his conclusion invalid.
Error: assumptoins Suggestion: assumptions
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
You may leave some time to check out typing errors or put less words.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 543 350
No. of Characters: 3013 1500
No. of Different Words: 260 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.827 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.549 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.031 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 242 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 183 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 131 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 80 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.412 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.288 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.459 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5