Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
An argument occasionally these days that the science research should force on the area which can benefit the public. Faced with a mass of nailing-biting information that lies around, one is often likely to be hesitant, for everything has its dichotomy. Trying to avoid being one of the mavericks and parrots of mainstream opinion, I, after through reflection and contemplation, firmly maintain that the science research have to find a balance between the different research field. To examine the validity of my standpoint further details will be carefully looked into as below.
To begin with, never should we forget the fact that some direction of benefiting the most people may be difficult to achieve. For example, it is impossible to have much improvement in health care that can cure all the disease. Specifically, it need a period of time to do research about how to cure only a single illness. If scientists put all their force to deal with the health care that will be inefficient. Furthermore, the AIDS cost the scientist a long time but still remains as a problem.
What's more it should be underscored that in some other fields of science which may not have direct benefit toward most people and regarded as some useless research do have the importance to be concentrated. For this kind of research will have a significant influence on human's history. If the there is no time or resource to study on these field that will impede the human process in searching of a new world. Furthermore, the development of the spaceflight has less relation with the people's real life, however, it is obviously crucial to our future when we will able to live on another planet. Hence, there is no reason to stop such research and pay too much attention to the greatest number of people.
What is also worth mentioning, the development of one field can also promote the progress of the others. Correlating the evidence above, the development of advanced science will have a optimistic impact on social development. For instance, the invention of the artificial intelligence helps the health care in some ways such as the help with the operation or manage the treat plan of patients. Additionally, without the support from other field health care would not developed so fast. Moreover, the medicine is made from complex processes which need a superb production technology. Therefore, we cannot ignore the importance of other science field as we focus on must people's benefit.
To put in a nutshell, it is sagacious to support the statement that scientists need to balance the research between the social development and advanced science.
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- Scientistsandotherresearchersshouldfocustheirresearchonareasthatarelikelytobenefitthegreatestnumberofpeople.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusstheextenttowhichyouagreeordisagreewiththerecommendationandexplainyourreasoningforthepositionyoutake.Indevelopingands 16
- "The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time period, however, he price of milk at the local Excello Food Market has increa 50
- "Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in many food stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old Dai 10
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ll the disease. Specifically, it need a period of time to do research about how to cure only a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bout how to cure only a single illness. If scientists put all their force to deal ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ime but still remains as a problem. Whats more it should be underscored that in s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ch will have a significant influence on humans history. If the there is no time or res...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...velopment of advanced science will have a optimistic impact on social development...
^
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'develop'
Suggestion: develop
... from other field health care would not developed so fast. Moreover, the medicine is made...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236514522822 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.143153526971 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0829875518672 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0497925311203 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0290456431535 0.0444667217837 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126556016598 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0186721991701 0.0406280797675 46% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.83707377474 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0394190871369 0.030933414821 127% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.122406639004 0.0997080785238 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0352697095436 0.0249443105267 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186721991701 0.0148568991511 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2638.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 440.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99545454545 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359090909091 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277272727273 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202272727273 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134090909091 0.132149295362 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83707377474 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 219.290929204 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 60.4897146708 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9523809524 23.380412469 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6418458881 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.619047619 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 23.380412469 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.809523809524 0.674092028746 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 48.6796536797 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.71962616822 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.391690518653 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0793477689894 0.123202303941 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0406266088286 0.077325440228 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.541223267481 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150859264544 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.161403998019 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0892212321368 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.418522195662 0.385218514788 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.058663143471 0.0692045440612 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.275328986314 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0653680567796 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.