1. Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author of the prompt asserts that there are two different perspectives toward the duty of politics. One school believes that politics should chase the ideal; on the other hand, another group emphasizes the importance of finding the common platform which is responsible for the majority’s demand. In what follows, I will list the possible rearing reasons for both categories and finally, I will posit my standpoint.
The first school, which asks for the pursuit of a goal, may have bolded the effect of the following an ideal in achieving the success. Indeed, according to the ideal-seeking nature of the human being, possessing an ultimate desire can be motivation for reaching a high-stand. This motor will be more effective if it owns the politics rearing. For instance, if the governor solo adherences the scientific achievements and provides a full-support ground for the scientific efforts, all people in the field of science will be eager to follow their creative thoughts and achieve a striking finding which could be applauded by the governor. Consequently, that specific society will be significant in the field of science among other societies. However, in this scenario, the ignorance of other areas is questionable?
On the other hand, as mentioned, there is another group which thinks the common ground according to majority approval should be the main duty of politics. This school has considered the existence of multi-parties in a specific politic. Each party will have its own beliefs and rules which could differ from others’. In this case, providing the joint scene for the majority will be mostly aligned with the fair government. In addition, this technique will increase the popularity of that governor since he could appeal to the majority of parties.
If I have to choose a side, the second group is the one with which I mostly concur. First of all, the discussed reason by this group is reasonable and plausible. Besides, I have one more reason for my viewpoint. The trend of modern politics is a democracy. The fundament of democracy is being responsible to the majority of people in a society. Since each individual has his or her specific desire, providing a public base which could appeal the most of the people’s requirement, the aim of the democracy will be done. Therefore, the politics by providing this common ground will fit into the democracy framework.
To wrap it up, although seeking an ideal will guarantees the achievement of significant achievements; the common base is more aligned with the democracy standard, are more beneficial for the majority of citizens.
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
- 1.Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain 54
- tpo 23 75
- tpo49-integ 85
- tpo10 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15690866511 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92905620623 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487119437939 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0935587673 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296084238946 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860458068625 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575477170927 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167375482306 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372748023619 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.