In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society toregard any living man or woman as a hero.
In the contemporary society, some may believe that it is impossible for modern people find any living ones as heroes because of the serious media coverage. However, from my perspective, it is the fast-spreading media that ensures any kind of people and relevant events can be shown on the Internet. In this way, people are more likely to find someone who meets their own definition of heroes.
To begin with, Internet creates a magnificent stage for the ordinary people, whose glory and great experience is always neglected. A firefighter who gets injury because of saving people, a doctor who has no rest in a whole month in order to do more operation and save more people, or a teacher who do his duty for thirty years, can be regarded as a hero according to someone’s opinion. Thanks to the intensive media, their stories are more likely to be depicted to us since such experience really attract people and people may have more interest to get familiar with them. By contrast, in the past when the spreading of information was not so quick, these ordinary people might be overlooked, even though they had done something excellent.
Furthermore, everyone has their own definition of hero. Some may believe that the real great man who promotes the development of human beings can be regarded as a hero, others value those who sacrifice their own interest in order to help others; some may think that a hero is perfect and cannot make any mistakes, others regard that it is some errors that shape a hero instead of a god. On the Internet, you can always find someone fit your criteria since its intensive coverage.
Certainly, some may argue that these so called “heroes” are fake and unreal, whose experience may be exaggerated and beautified. However, the significance of a hero is not the hero himself but his spirit behind him. Even though the story that someone sacrifices himself to save others is exaggerated, it does not matter those who regard him as a hero learn from his spirit and try to help others in their daily life. In this way, the meaning of heroes is valuable.
To sum up, the intensive media coverage increases the exposure of ordinary people and the diversity on Internet allows all kinds of people to be observed, both of which contribute the possibility that fits the standard of heroes. Certainly, the problem of exaggeration cannot be neglected but if people can learn from the exaggerated story, it is still positive in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-25 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
- Pterosaurs 60
- communal online encyclopedias 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Archaeologists have been wondering about the function of the shafts in the Great Pyramid which was built for an ancient Egyptian king The passage believes that the shafts are used for ventilation for religious reasons and as the passageways for the king s 75
- TV appearance for professors 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... their own definition of hero. Some may believe that the real great man who promotes th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, still, in general, kind of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83451536643 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66705226661 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498817966903 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8970807029 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8125 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168212458078 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061001124943 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455828617719 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985517874894 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291008169169 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... their own definition of hero. Some may believe that the real great man who promotes th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, still, in general, kind of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83451536643 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66705226661 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498817966903 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8970807029 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8125 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168212458078 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061001124943 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455828617719 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985517874894 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291008169169 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.