In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
The ways of getting the knowledge has differential source: it varies upon the attitude and preference upon the person’s. The speaker asserts that in the arena of television, reading a books to insight the knowledge is just a trivial one. People can gain ultimate knowledge by watching of television in comparisons to reading a books. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the author’s suggestions and argue that majority of the person’s prefers books rather than television in the search of their knowledge for three reasons.
To begin with, books provides the comprehensive knowledge of any subject matter. For instances, if we want to study about the structure of DNA, we can make detailed study in the book with its diagrammatic and well-labelled figure. We can make a complete study of any subject matter in a coherence way, which can be provided by book. However, in the television, it will generally give basic and superficial idea. The information that was delivered from the television cannot be revised and no longer retention, and, the foregrounded information in books can be retained for the longer period of time.
Of course, the people frequently suffered from the high eye related problems due to the harmful, blue and ultra-violent rays coming from the television. This will be detrimental to the student who have eye problems and especially suffered from the dryness of eyes. One of my friends, frequently used the lubricating eye drop for moisturizing of his eye during the watching of television. Morever, it makes enervated and dull, on long standing of these types of rays producing technology and today majority of the people were facing the eye problem and their vision has been decreasing. On long term these types of rays also causes the cancerous disease. The above example illustrates the defects of using of televisions or any technological devices on using it for a long period of time.
Every individual may not have the affordability of the television. Morever, it is also not portable everywhere. Thus, due to the affordability of books, it also can be preferred by the poor people and portability leads to it more convenient.
Of course, some argue that in our increasingly globalized world, television can provide can provides the knowledge in a visual pattern. However, isn’t that, why we should follow the comfort? If we do so, the knowledge or idea may not be comprehensive. Little knowledge is peril and may leads to the failure of our any work due to incomplete idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sandeshbhandari2 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Bikram Sitaula | 50 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | Antony Urmise Jose | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 83
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 83
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own," disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning". 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a book' or simply 'books'?
Suggestion: a book; books
...hat in the arena of television, reading a books to insight the knowledge is just a triv...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a book' or simply 'books'?
Suggestion: a book; books
...of television in comparisons to reading a books. In my opinion, I completely disagree w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any subject matter. For instances, if we want to study about the structure of DNA...
^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...in books can be retained for the longer period of time. Of course, the people frequently suf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the watching of television. Morever, it makes enervated and dull, on long standi...
^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing technology and today majority of the people were facing the eye problem and t...
^^
Line 5, column 775, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ological devices on using it for a long period of time. Every individual may not have the af...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...lized world, television can provide can provides the knowledge in a visual pattern. Howe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, of course, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09592326139 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05328427137 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501199040767 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4849310543 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5909090909 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238776031417 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685136089028 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088509285546 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126245205259 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587204176245 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.