In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
According to the speaker, in the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was and people can learn as much from watching television as they can. I am some to extend agree with the speaker that people can learn more from television, however, books are also acts as best source of knowledge and more easier to handle and carried out.
Speaker contends that we can learn much from watching television, as television acts as the best source of learning for all age group of people. Consider an examples, a learning child can learn more effective through audio-visual aids than that of books. The television attracts the focus of child through the visuals thereby increasing concentration toward it that results the quicker learning of subject matters. Similarly, the people who are not able to learn the books and understand the written things, can also effectively learn and understand through television.
Similarly, television acts as best medium to disseminate the important news and information among the peoples. For examples, a journalist collects the different news regarding to the important events which should be disseminated among the public. For this, it is difficult to transmit the information by printing in the pamphlets or other means. During these circumstances, it is more effective to transmit information through television among the public: which acts as easier means as compared to printing materials.
However, books are also acts as superior means in some circumstances as compared to television. For example, books are more portable than television; they don’t require wires and electricity as that of television. People can carry it at anywhere- room, traveling, beds- and at anyplace. It is easier to use as and when desire to read.
So, speaker contend television as best means of learning, mainly for focusing the dissemination important message and best suitable for all the age groups, while book also acts as best means to read the desire subjects at anywhere due its portable nature as compared to the television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sandeshbhandari2 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Bikram Sitaula | 50 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | Antony Urmise Jose | 66 | view |
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own," disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning". 66
- In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...so acts as best source of knowledge and more easier to handle and carried out. Speaker co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an example' or simply 'examples'?
Suggestion: an example; examples
...g for all age group of people. Consider an examples, a learning child can learn more effect...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22089552239 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88516998399 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45671641791 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.48849012 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439728476427 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156622696335 0.0831039109588 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186694721289 0.0758088955206 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25239294734 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169233338953 0.0667264976115 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.