An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
It is the right of every patient to know about the capabalities of the doctor in which they have entrusted their health care to. The patient's trust with their doctor is as important as the treatment given for the ailment. However, this knowledge might bring in additionaly issues during the course of the treatment. Hence, I believe that an ailing patient should not be privy to information that is beyond their sphere of understanding.
Firstly, I would like to point out that trust is an important factor for curing a disease. A positive vibe has been proved to provide a greater success in eradicating a disease. Let us consider the case of a surgery where in most of their patients are under anesthasia during the operation. The amount of trust placed on the surgeon is mountaneous. Even in an unconsious state, the patient has to be emotionally stable for the surgery to end well. Hence, when an ailing patient is provided with access to previous records, there are possibilities that it might induce greater fear in their patients thus reducing the success of the treatment.
Secondly, an ailing patient might not have sufficient knowledge to understand the records provided. Thus this move to provide easy access to patients would not have any gain. Additionally, a medical scholar might be able to understand the treatment methods all too well and could be critical of this treatment. In this case, every suggestion of their doctor would be critisized by the patient. The dubious patient would put forward increased amount of questions and the doctor would have to spent additional time to provide assurance. Also, is it necessary to provide records of other treatments in all cases? For simple and non-fatal diseases, this move would be useless.
Thirdly, giving access to records of previous patients with similar ailments would be bring forth privacy issues. However, this easy access would also cause the doctor to keep himself in check at all times. Knowing that the treatment of every patient is important to determine the future of his career would be incentive for doctors to not persue underhand methods. Thus, this can also be a boon the ailing patient. But this positive edge does not overcome the numerous drawbacks it brings with it.
To sum, an ailing patient should not be given easy access to doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients as this causes the doctors to be at a huge disadvantage and can affect the success of the treatment provided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
- “The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the la 62
- “An increased number of laws or rules, ironically leads to a diminished sense of morality and impoverished relationsamong people.” 62
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the regional manager of the Taste of Italy restaurant chain:“After the first month of service, the new restaurant in the Flatplains Mall, which uses the Chipless brand of wine glasses,has reported a far lower 70
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...ledge might bring in additionaly issues during the course of the treatment. Hence, I believe that an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...dge to understand the records provided. Thus this move to provide easy access to pat...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in all cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217582417582 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.173626373626 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0813186813187 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0549450549451 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0373626373626 0.0444667217837 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107692307692 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0483516483516 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64426959033 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0483516483516 0.030933414821 156% => OK
Particles: 0.0021978021978 0.0016655270985 132% => OK
Determiners: 0.131868131868 0.0997080785238 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0395604395604 0.0249443105267 159% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00879120879121 0.0148568991511 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2499.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 417.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9928057554 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386091127098 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275779376499 0.280924506359 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187050359712 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115107913669 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64426959033 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462829736211 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.2021362683 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1304347826 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4406624579 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.652173913 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.739130434783 0.674092028746 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 45.7083724325 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.40495867769 1.64882698954 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431594400223 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105522071999 0.123202303941 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0643706881571 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.505255644067 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150186370725 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165265097979 0.161403998019 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879472159076 0.0892212321368 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.498579609737 0.385218514788 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0599434750725 0.0692045440612 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322291685178 0.275328986314 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314299529275 0.0653680567796 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.