"All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage
students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."
I completely agree with the author that all nations should take a step to develop a global university that will teach students to solve the world's most ongoing social problems. It is necessary to tackle or avoid nearly all social problems.
Firstly, In the world today, there are social problems such as terrorism, corruption, etc. which can be devastated only by providing information and tactics to current university students to overcome it. For instance, if are able to know about any terror attack using surveillance as intelligence agencies do for it, for which problem-solving strategies are taught to students in that field, then we can easily prevent attacks.
Secondly, The most dangerous and vulnerable social problem today is climate change because of which our planet is getting into trouble. Universities should be designed such that they can give a perception to students of how jeopardy it is through different organized seminars, discussion groups in universities, so it will reduce constantly rising global warming. For example, The massive destructive flood in Mumbai on 26 July 2005. If the literate people were aware of hygiene and cleanliness, they would not throw garbage on the streets and at any place and hence it might be prevented. So, the nation should disseminate awareness about such calamities and solutions to prevent it to their students.
Thirdly, Social problems such as population, unemployment are getting most precarious. For this, nations should come ahead and integrate universities to face such consequences.
In sum, definitely, by developing the global university to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems, we can avoid or overcome or easily face consequences to problems such as corruption, terrorism, climate change, population, unemployment, and many more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-20 | Tendo407 | 83 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | Jatin Chaudhari | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | Sudan Devkota | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | Shreyan36 | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-07 | afeezbadmus767@ | 66 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 55
- The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of mear in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world s most persistent social problems 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46527777778 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00789053631 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6966576278 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402164551491 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129292802784 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113233257463 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235296102245 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101432154159 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.