All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
I agree to the statement.
Companies hire both lateral employees and also graduates fresh from college through on-campus hiring programmes. Firstly, I will talk about just graduate employees hired from on-campus.
Company provides training to fresh graduates employees and prepare them for industry standard before they are made permanent employees. Company invests resources, time, study materials, instructors in providing best training to freshers. They undergo rigorous training to get into IT industry mainstream. These employees spend lot of time in studying, absorbing training material, completing assignments and to become permanent employees in company. Since they are just out of college they are fresh with academic taught in the college, hence they can learn better from training and also invest time to study more and master further. They are also willing to learn more technologies and struggle harder. Since, they are new and not exposed to IT industry, companies can tune freshers to understand company operations and standards to work more efficiently. Though freshers lack IT knowledge and company working style they are innovative and they can provide fresh ideas to work more efficiently. They can provide out of box ideas which might turn out to be useful. Since companies invest heavily on fresh graduates employees to train them, I feel company should confidently listen to and address concerns of these employees to take most out of them. This make employees to stay in company longer and thereby training given by company does not go waste.
Secondly, I would like to talk about lateral or experienced employees. These are employees hired from a different companies. Company invests resources in hiring them, by going through their resumes, conducting multiple round of interviews, selecting them and offering job to them. These are the employees who have worked with other companies before and they are exposed to different work environment and challenges. They may or may not be given training by their previous employers. These employees are new, they can provide more ideas based on their previous work experience. I strongly feel, companies should listen to these employees as their ideas might prove useful and they can help operate company more efficiently.
But there will be a times when company is in need of more efficient and more experienced employee for a particular project work, in this situation instead of hiring a new employee, company can hire a consultant to work for project timeline. This is based on situation.
Thus, for a proper company functioning company should listen to employees. This ensures employee satisfaction and they try to given in their best and work hard for company. This also saves company resources being spend for consultants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ht in the college, hence they can learn better from training and also invest time to s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'company'?
Suggestion: company
...se are employees hired from a different companies. Company invests resources in hiring th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
... more efficiently. But there will be a times when company is in need of more efficie...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35972850679 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71414109894 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457013574661 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9367428793 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1153846154 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314909954672 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103270997923 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890784901701 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179200310832 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101398356582 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.