All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
A developing business always has the goal of expansion. To expand however, requires expertise as well as critical understanding of the operations of a business. Consultants are often approached in order to analyze the running of the company, usually for financial as well as structural matters. The development of a business can also be improved by involving subordinates in the decision-making process by asking for their feedback that could help propel the business further. However, in terms of impact, outside forces certainly will provide an unbiased and clear goal of just improving the business as a whole and not internal relations. As such, in a realistic sense, I disagree with the stance that consulting workers instead of external consultants is a better choice.
Productive workers are persistent and will work arduously to meet their objectives which in turn helps the business. But each worker is an individual body and not uniform system. Every individual is different and each person may have different targets. By prioritising workers for consultancy, the business may become more divergent and uncertain due to a flood of varying opinions. These opionions may also be biased in some way. One particular worker in XYZ company may look for personal benefits when asked for a view on how to increase expansion. The worker could conclude that by giving workers higher wages and promotions, it would lead to better productivity which may in turn lead to more company revenue. However, the worker's self-centered reasoning would not apply to improving the business condition, as the costs in terms of wage increases may not support the improved revenue at all. As such, the worker's point would be disregarded and all the time invested in the "worker-oriented consultancy" would be for nothing.
External consultants, although expensive, certainly offer an interesting, well-crafted reasoning to support their assertation. They earn a living for "thinking outside the box" and their opinions are thoroughly researched before presentation. Certainly, some consultants may be greedier than others but they all have the purpose of doing their job: help the company grow. Imagine if there was no Accenture or J.P. Morgan? Companies like these, survive because of their consultancy and their input to major firms like Microsoft and Boeing. It would be debasing to external consultants if their jobs were replaced by internal workers that probably did not have the experience and skills needed for consultancy to work.Still, the opinions of workers must be highly regarded especially their feedback regarding any new business initiative.
Morale is critical for a healthy business. It could, as a result, be argued that workers consultancy would increase their morale and boost both growth as well as the required database of ideas. However, the argument could not take-off well if we consider how long is the productivity or morale going to last? The choices of people are ever-changing and so will the morale of workers regardless of their importance to the consulting the business.
In conclusion, from the realistic point of view and not an idealistic view, it is clear that external consultants earn their bread and butter by giving advice on improving the business and that they will provide a cogent analysis of business operations. Workers are to be valued, but involving them in consultancy would both waste time as well as resources, since training will have to be induced. As such, external consultants are still the best people to go to for consistent business advice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks. 66
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 86
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers. 50
- Some believe the more comforts a society provides, the more likely it is to create people whocannot provide for themselves. Others believe such comforts are indicative of a society’s self-sufficiency. 66
- In a study of the music listening preferences of Hollyland residents conducted by the University of Sunnyland most respondents listed their favorite type of music as country However another study indicated that in Hollyland the most frequently downloaded 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 727, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Still
...d skills needed for consultancy to work.Still, the opinions of workers must be highly...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
.... It could, as a result, be argued that workers consultancy would increase their morale...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ease their morale and boost both growth as well as the required database of ideas. However...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 337, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...em in consultancy would both waste time as well as resources, since training will have to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3044.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31239092496 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05192442994 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47294938918 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 943.2 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1218153953 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4642857143 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60714285714 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279549550437 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734382032622 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05954245144 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157408060706 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510793487251 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.