All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to
operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own
employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The author here suggest that the companies should not hire outside consultants for solving their problems, they should listen to their own employees. I disagree the authors consideration because outside consultants can solve the problem more efficiently than the employees itself.
The first and foremost reason is that if a company employee is to make decisions about the problems of its own organization then he would solve it such that he gets benefited from that. But hiring outside consultants always aims for the benefit the company which hires it. The outside consultants do not get influenced by the way the employees may think about his/her main aim is to make the company efficient.
If the employees of the company are to be taken all the decisions then there foremost aim would be make a policy which benefits them first and then the company. There is always a chance that the efficiency of the company may decrease by this prospect of the employees. Thus it is necessary to hire outside consultants for the suggestion to operate the company in a more efficient way. For example a policy of the company were to be decided by the employees of the company they made policies which benefits them and not the organization.
Besides this all the outside which is to be hired by the company should be an expert in that field because the company pays a lot for the suggestions given by them. The experts is a particular field always have a wide prospectus for the company because
they have a lot of experience in doing the same. They knew the future problems and ways to solve them. But if the employees of the company were given the task then they may not knew all the prospects their decision. Even if they wanted to benefit their
company by increasing the efficiency they may not be able to do it with such perfection as the consultants do.
Despite the above reasons to supports the need to hire the outside consultants instead of the suggestions of the employees to operate efficiently, their are certain benefits if the decisions were made by the employees. The most preferable way I think is think is to make a combination of the consultants and certain expert employees of the who knows the best for the company. If this combination is used that both the
company and employees will work more efficiently and hence makes it more successful.
Thus I disagree the statement made because there is always a need to hire outside consultants for the advice in order to take decisions which increase the efficiency of the company.
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situations or surrounding than by society as a whole. 16
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.Write a report for a university lecturer, de 73
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... to their own employees. I disagree the authors consideration because outside consultan...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ease by this prospect of the employees. Thus it is necessary to hire outside consult...
^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
... suggestions given by them. The experts is a particular field always have a wide p...
^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...f the employees to operate efficiently, their are certain benefits if the decisions w...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 246, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'think is'.
Suggestion: think is
...he employees. The most preferable way I think is think is to make a combination of the consultant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and hence makes it more successful. Thus I disagree the statement made because t...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for example', 'i think', 'by the way']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213043478261 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.169565217391 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0652173913043 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0586956521739 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0608695652174 0.0444667217837 137% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.119565217391 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0282608695652 0.0406280797675 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69679849218 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0369565217391 0.030933414821 119% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.163043478261 0.0997080785238 164% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0239130434783 0.0249443105267 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0130434782609 0.0148568991511 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2554.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 440.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80454545455 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311363636364 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268181818182 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165909090909 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69679849218 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 219.290929204 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.368181818182 0.48968727796 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.0456111203 55.4138127331 72% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4444444444 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0628428617 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.888888889 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.94800884956 182% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 51.2626262626 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.24812030075 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343007546379 0.391690518653 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.171974403811 0.123202303941 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0850679784999 0.077325440228 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.730298629686 0.547984918172 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175956432716 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182573271793 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698559920193 0.0892212321368 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.329210270782 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.208675241002 0.0692045440612 302% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218209080092 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518803276182 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.