All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
In this modern world, we have witnessed the great popularity of consulting companies. These companies carry great prestige and their services are highly valued. It is uncommon for a company to seek professional advices from outside consultants to work more efficiently. The prompt suggests, however, companies hire outside consultant to suggest ways of the company to operate more efficiently too often. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. Altough the prompt brought up a very important point that sometimes are neglected by the management of some companies, outside consultant's expert advices should not be neglected by any means.
Indeed, it is important for a company to listen to the voices of its employees. The employees are doing all the works for the company and are more likely to have a better understanding of the challenges and strength a company has. By listening to its employees, a company can greatly improve its operating efficiency and will more likely to be competitive. Companies that are known to care about its employee's opinions and emphasize "democracy" are likely to have less internal problems and a more friendly working environment in general. Their employees are generally happier and are less likely to be distracted by unpleasent conclits, hence yielding better performance, which ultimately benefit the companies.
At the same time, expert opinions from outside consultants are likely to improve a company's working performace. This is because these consultants are generally experts in its own field and have more experience in tackling challenges companies are facing. Their experience enables them to provide insights for a company in dealing with specific matters and give the company an alternative perspective about the challenges, which will likely to provide a solution a company has not previously considered or identify the problem the company is facing but fails to perceive.
In summary, in order for a company to operate efficiently, it is important for the company to listen to both the voices of its own employees and outisde consultants. A company that has a good understanding of itself and has access to the expertise in its field will excel in the increasingly tough competition in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 16
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, in general, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35054347826 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10495818009 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475543478261 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9393523299 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0625 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0305313016974 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0141217702611 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0178901783412 0.0758088955206 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0216869859645 0.150359130593 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00737913101313 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.