Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Sincere and insightful critical judgments are of great value to work in any given field. The people who listen to these critiques will benefit tremendously. However, too often, we have seen too many critiques from people with different backgrounds. These critiques usually have very different opinions and can sometimes cause confusion. So it is not surprising to see the prompt argue that critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. In my opinion, this argument is true on some occasions while being invalid on others because of the following reasons.
It is true that in a lot of cases, the only valid critical judgments come from experts in the field. For instance, in order to improve a highly complicated scientific research program like a nuclear program, only the opinions of the experts in the field should be considered. These experts have a deep understanding of the field, can accurately identify the challenges the program is facing, and can provide insightful critical judgments to the program in order to improve its performance. It will be ridiculous if the program listens to critiques not from an expert, as not only these judgments will likely provide no constructive advice but may also lead the program into a hazardous state.
However, on the opposite end of the spectrum, there are cases in which everyone’s critique is as important. For movies, the public’s opinions on the subject are often much more important than the opinions of the critics and it is not uncommon to see a movie to be extremely popular among viewers while not being appreciated by the critics and vice versa. When people go to see a movie, they often rely on review websites like IMDB and Rotten Tomato where other movie goers post their reviews. Although these sites also have expert reviews of the movie, their judgments are often overwhelmed by the average movie goer’s reviews. A lot of times, people go to see a movie just based on the recommendation of someone they know rather than reviews.
In other cases, critical judgments from both experts and average people are important. When a mobile application is designed, the team must listen to the critiques from both software engineering experts and its users and all these opinions are of great importance to the success of the project. The expert may provide great advice on the architecture and system design of the application and this is critical to the function of the application. At the same time, the user’s feedback is equally important as it provides a lot of useful information to the team on how to make the application more user friendly.
In summary, there are cases in which only opinions from experts should be considered while there are cases in which critical judgments from people even without the expertise and experience are highly valuable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in summary, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2423.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97535934292 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70132549122 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445585215606 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3724391089 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.15 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.35 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240524927643 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870223590026 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10981866817 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142446998571 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812166918063 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.