All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Managing and running an organization especially one that is expected to return a lot of profit can be a very difficult task. One of the many challenges that those in charge of managing these companies have to face is how to ameliorate efficiency. Companies would very often hire external consultants to suggest ways in which they increase efficiency, and this can be seen as a very wise decision if implemented properly.
One of the reasons why it is advisable to hire outside consultants is that they would tend to have an unbiased and objective view about decesions involving various departments of the company. The employees of the company, if tasked with this decesion, might not implement it as they already have a status quo, something that works and they might find it hard to want to change that. Afterall the old saying goes: If its not broken, don't try to fix it. However, an external consultant would look at things without much sentiment, and could identify faults that employees didn't even know existed.They could even take apart supposedly working systems and find ways to improve them. For example most employess who have been at a company for years and are used to a conventional method of taking daily attendance such as swiping their assigned ID cards would not see the need to seek better ways by which attendance can be captured because the swiping of ID cards works just fine. An external consultant however could notice that it takes up a lot of time, which could be used to carry out productive work, and could seek to implement a faster method secadfuch as thumbprinting.
Another reason why hiring external consultants may be better is that they are probably experts in the field with more experience working with multiple organizations. Employees at the company especially those who have been there for a long time would probably be instituitionalized. They do not know what life is outside that company. Everyday for the last decade or maybe even two, they drove to the same spot, sat at the same desk, observed the same protocols and probably ate the same lunch. To them anything other that this is alien. Anexternal consultant however has probably worked with other organizations with similar goals, they have seen other processes impkemented and they are better suited to make an comparison on which is more effecient. Moreover, they would probably have more specialty in that are as compared to an employee.
Although, employees of the company may be said to know their organization better and what effects and improved or diminished efficiency brings affects them directly so it may make sense that they would have some ideas on possible ways to improve efficiency. However, they would not do as good a job as an external unbiased expert which is what the company would be looking to get in a hired consultant.
Improvement and innovation are the most important things that would ensure competition and survival of any organization especially in these century and a lot of organization are looking to take advantage of ways in which they can stay relevant in the market. It wpould be wise if they were to invest in an external expert consultant sothey as to ensure that improve efficiency.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- We need to increase the funding for the movie in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for shampoo company Since the advertisement business is n 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...ht find it hard to want to change that. Afterall the old saying goes: If its not broken,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the old saying goes: If its not broken, dont try to fix it. However, an external con...
^^^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd could identify faults that employees didnt even know existed.They could even take ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
... that employees didnt even know existed.They could even take apart supposedly workin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...know what life is outside that company. Everyday for the last decade or maybe even two, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nted and they are better suited to make an comparison on which is more effecient. ...
^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood a job as an external unbiased expert which is what the company would be looki...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this century' or 'these centuries'?
Suggestion: this century; these centuries
...vival of any organization especially in these century and a lot of organization are looking t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2681.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91926605505 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77374272108 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460550458716 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 854.1 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6829491213 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.05 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255716410677 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829976089012 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646798873472 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154202488859 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407626573901 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.