Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
Effective leadership is best achieved when leaders do what is right regardless of what their followers think. By this, they set a good precedent for future leaders. Therefore sound moral judgement, the ability to effectively delineate right and wrong, is a more important leadership quality than the ability to maintain the respect of leadership peers.
When a leader is able to effectively distinguish between right and wrong he proves that he is not easily prone to bias. For example, in an office where a manager notices employees pilfering commodities when he challenges erring employees for doing wrong, he immediately places himself on a high moral pedestal. This gives him the responsibility to maintain his moral uprightness by not falling victim to bias. This ultimately imbibes an attribute of impartiality that is most evidient in every model leader because he leads by example and followers observe and learn from him. It also dispels any form of enmity within employees.
A leader with sound moral judgement gains the respect of his follower compared to a leader who only seeks respect from his fellow leaders. A study by a group of behavioural psychologists on manger-employee relationships, showed that employees spoke more highly of their leaders when they observed that they were morally upright. This is backed up by an example of a pharmacy store where sales attendants are observed to be punctual to work because the superintendent pharmacist is regularly punctual. This supports the claim that leaders gain the respect of their followers when they are morally upright. Only in this respect can there be effective leadership.
While obtaining the respect of peer leaders is also important in that it fosters a good relationship between leaders and followers. This respect should not be gotten at the expense of moral judgement. This eventually leads to the ridicule of the leader because the respect that is not obtained morally is easily lost by the followers. This counters effective leadership.
In Summary, sound moral judgement poses a greater benefit to leadership that respect because, sound moral judgement is certain to eventually result in respect for leaders. Whereas respect at the expense of moral probity has adverse consequence on the long-term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview Our citizens are well aware of the fact that while the Grandview Symphony Orchestra was struggling to succeed our city government promised annual funding to help support its 69
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
- The following appeared as part of an article in a Dillton newspaper In an effort to bring new jobs to Dillton and stimulate the city s flagging economy Dillton s city council voted last year to lower the city s corporate tax rate by 15 percent at the same 78
- The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...et a good precedent for future leaders. Therefore sound moral judgement, the ability to e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...orally is easily lost by the followers. This counters effective leadership. In Su...
^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...entually result in respect for leaders. Whereas respect at the expense of moral probity...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30494505495 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89999953154 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.760757269 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.631578947 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246799879334 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832154043203 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577075910058 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149061828843 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289515238755 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.