Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
History is replete with numerous examples of illustrious men who were great leaders not because they were morally just but because they respected the sentiments of their peers. I, strongly agree with the author's opinion that a strong and effective leader primarily needs to respect his or her peers, then come in sound moral judgement. And this fact can be well established if we walk down memory lane.
Primarily, to become a leader your peers and followers need to give you the power to lead. They should believe in you as their guide, trust you for your decisions and have faith in your actions which they should perceive are in their own favour but the morality of those actions might not concern each and every follower. As many a times followers inherently become like sheeps and they do not care to critically analyse or question their leader. The most controversial yet veracious example of that of Hitler. Hitler rose to power for all wrong reasons. His claim of Aryans as the superior race which needed protection made his peers believe that he respects their identity over all others and they became loyalists, so much so that when his hatred for the Jews had become gruesome and unthinkable, yet his followers did not leave his side and believed in his perspective so much so as to become morally corrupt. History has numerous examples of dictators who were in fact leaders and respected among majoritarian groups of their time even if they were contemptuous toward other groups; they gained the trust of the former group and rose to power.
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind", quoted by a much celebrated leader of all times, Mahatma Gandhi. When we consider Gandhi, he is a prime example of a leader with great moral principles. But was it was not hos moral principles that caused Pre-Independence India to follow him but his ability to unite all factions of the society as he respected one and all and made them feel valued and treasured. Moral judgement is often than not ambivalent. Also maintaining univocal moral principles in changing times is not effective even for a leader. A leader should be sound enough in judgement and evolve with time. The judgement should be focused on the benefits and growth of his or her peers.
Ashoka the Great is much celebrated as a very righteous king. But in his early life to the point of Kalinga war his morality is questionable, as moral principles are bound to change in the journey of life where we are ever evolving.
Therefore, moral judgement though important is not the key attribute of a leader. A leader should be able to maintain the respect of his or her peers as that is what in the first place has enabled the leader to lead. Morality can be altered with time and also sound moral judgement for one might not be sound for another. Thereby moral principles can all but define the path of leadership whether the leader will lead people down the good road or bad but moral principles have a very minute role in leadership itself or its effectiveness
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 66
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...their peers. I, strongly agree with the authors opinion that a strong and effective lea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...and believed in his perspective so much so as to become morally corrupt. History has num...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...judgement is often than not ambivalent. Also maintaining univocal moral principles i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in fact, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2521.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74764595104 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55103358494 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476459510358 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1925478497 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.608695652 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0869565217 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329901724599 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955573412567 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752765287292 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187852396898 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842099875077 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.