Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
An effective leader should have distinctive characteristics including judging ability. He or she should ensure the basic rights to his/her subordinates. For ensuring the opportunities to his subordinates, one should be conspicuously very ethical that is moral judgement is very important.
From this point of view, moral judgement can violets to create opportunities to his/her subordinates thats why he can lack the respect. But if moral judgement is not made then it can create further more disruption. A leader should obviously supports his/her peers but only from the moral point. If we think about a prime minister of a country that he/she is represented as a leader of a country. If prime minister only supports his peers against an unethical doing, he/she will be hatred by some of his peer rather some of the peer will think this is creditable because he/she saves his peers. So questions arise "what is more important-respects or moral judgement?" In this case moral judgement will make yourself to become pellucid to others as well as to you. Sometimes clemency can be considered. Moral judgements do not say that "Don't apologize". It says give punishment for the respective crime as needed. Prevarication is also a crime. If moral judgement is not made then you are doing this crime unconsciously and it can not furtive yourself. It can be soften or destructive. But it is important more than anything to become clear to you as well as others.
Additionally, maintain the respect to the peers is equally important. If moral judgement is made then respect will automatically gained.
So moral judgement can be far more important to stabilizing the situation that is the behoove of an effective leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e opportunities to his/her subordinates thats why he can lack the respect. But if mor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...e disruption. A leader should obviously supports his/her peers but only from the moral p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ll be hatred by some of his peer rather some of the peer will think this is creditable beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 850, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
... Moral judgements do not say that 'Dont apologize'. It says give punishmen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pect to the peers is equally important. If moral judgement is made then respect wi...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'gain'
Suggestion: gain
...is made then respect will automatically gained. So moral judgement can be far more im...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nt to stabilizing the situation that is the behoove of an effective leader.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, as to, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1524822695 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22674186841 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507092198582 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7319501969 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4736842105 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8421052632 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300081613489 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920935858034 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082360289766 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209535873429 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504559070031 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.