Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
There are many controversies about the argument that the author presented. Some people agree with the argument that constantly receiving respect from peers is more important aspects of effective leaders than sound moral judgement. However, an ability to do sound moral judgement is as important as being respected by peers.
Admittedly, being respected is one of the most important characterisct as a leader because respect gives authority and power to a leader to lead people. For example, Augustus, who was the first emperor of Roman Empire, always tried to receive respect from senator members and citizens even though he has absolute power to lead the empire after eradicating most his enemies. Due to his effort to be respected by surrounding people, he was able to push ahead most his plan to make his empire more wealthy and powerful without facing with opponents. Also, former president of South Korea, Jung-hee Park, could implement many policies to improve South Korea's economic situation because he was respected by his followers. Although he was a dictator and killed many citizens to keep his presidency, he always maintained his reputation as a clean and dedicated leader, and it helped him to be respected by most people and gave power to propel his idea to make South Korea as a developed country. As these example shows, receiving respect is helpful to leader by giving authority and power to implement policies that the leaders want to achieve.
However, having ability to do sound moral judgment is also important aspect to be successful leader. People might respect some leaders because of their achievement, but this kind of respect is not sustainable if there is serious defect on a leader's moral judgment. Jung-hee Park was also killed by one of his followers because he was continuously losing his ability to make right moral judgment. Before he was assasinated, he had ordered to kill citizens who demonstrated against his dictatorship. Also, Bill Clinton, who was former president of the United States, almost lost his presidency because of his poor moral decision about having inappropriate relationship with one of his followers. Even though Clinton achieved huge success in resurecting economy of his country, he was heavily blamed by this moral decision. Therefore, having great ability to make sound moral judgment could not be condoned if a leader wants to maintain his leadership and stay in his or her position.
In sum, as discussed above, it is not deniable that being respected is one of the most important aspects of leader, but having ability to make right moral decision is also extremly important to be successful leader. Therefore, if a leader want to be effective, he or she has to have both abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high people visit the doctor only once or twice per 68
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 73
- The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago Furthermore there has been 53
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important as being respected by peers. Admittedly, being respected is one of th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cies that the leaders want to achieve. However, having ability to do sound mora...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...stainable if there is serious defect on a leaders moral judgment. Jung-hee Park was also ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rship and stay in his or her position. In sum, as discussed above, it is not de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, as for, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09977827051 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75293212895 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8506952743 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404017310649 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151525837257 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106992407487 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275768046756 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619438815314 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important as being respected by peers. Admittedly, being respected is one of th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cies that the leaders want to achieve. However, having ability to do sound mora...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...stainable if there is serious defect on a leaders moral judgment. Jung-hee Park was also ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rship and stay in his or her position. In sum, as discussed above, it is not de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, as for, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09977827051 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75293212895 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8506952743 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404017310649 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151525837257 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106992407487 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275768046756 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619438815314 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.