Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The success of many well reputed organization often comes up as a result of excellent leadership qualities. One of the major factors that influence a good reputation of an organization is loyalty and loyalty of an organization is an epitome of sound moral judgement of its leader. Therefore, an effective leader should possess sound moral judgement as an important trait in order to have consistency in performance of his organization.
Leadership qualities not only include patronizing peers but also include strong decision making abilities. A leader of any organization, be it public or private, often faces the situations that demands her/him to make a strong decision that affect the reputation of his/her organization for its fidelity when it comes to dealing with organization's client.
For instance, a breach of trust with the clients would definitely desecrate the reputation of the organization. If any subordinate/peer of an organization actively invovles in an activity that is extremely disloyal to its clients, then the organization would lose its reputation and would no longer be trusted.
To support the previous statement, imagine a situation where a highly qualified worker leaks some of the confidential details of the clients for his/her benefits and an effective leader of this organization does not take a moral judgement such as sacking this highly skilled peer in order to not lose the valuable peer in terms of qualifications. This is certainly not a good characteristic of an effective leader since he/she puts his/her highly qualified peer, who is a valuable asset to the organization in terms of talent, over his/her clients, when it comes to serious matters like breach of trust that requires sound moral judgement of an effective leader.
Hence, an effective leader should always make a sound moral judgement irrespective of the fact that he/she would not maintain the respect of his or her peers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n where a highly qualified worker leaks some of the confidential details of the clients for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30844155844 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13534003624 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3612315541 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.5 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41438471579 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175726044421 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144817239648 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238263107752 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123898516386 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.