Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The argument that the leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers is more important than them having a sound moral judgement is one that can spark many discussions. However, the two aspects of the issue aren't as disparate as they seem. While it is important for a leader to be able to command respect from people around, it is inherently related to their ability to make decisions that warrant this respect.
Often, a leader is an influential force to a large number of people. Consequently, their actions play an important role in shaping the experiences of their peers. Moreover, leaders have a moral responsibility to make ethical, yet efficient decisions when faced with dilemmas. Leaders have a potential to change the world for the better, and to do so, they would require the ability to throughly analyse and choose the best option available to them.
That being said, this sound moral judgement also inevitably earns the respect of the leader's peers. To illustrate with an example, people may be more wary of a newly elected minister and his claims, until he implements something to benefit his people's welfare, proving to the masses that he is deserving of the post. Following that, these people are more likely to vote for him in the next round of elections. With this respect, leaders can make various decisions while being backed up by his peers.
However, respect is not always a good thing. In a few cases, it may be induced forcefully due to fear, or some other reason. For instance, the leader might be one with no sound decision-making capabilites, but still maintains the respect of his or her peers. For a more elaborate example, take the Nazi leader, Hitler; He was the most respected amongst others in the party, but in terms of ethical views, he was largely incapable of making good decisions. His actions were also detrimental to many, causing widespread alarm and concern. Furthermore, on a global scale, he was widely unpopular for his treatment of people from certain races and his support group was limited to his peers.
To conclude, this multi-faceted statement cannot exactly be qualified with an extremely biased view on either side due to the interdependencies between a leader's good judgement and their ability to maintain the respect of those around them. However, just being respected, under the wrong circumstances, where the leader is someone simply unable to make good decisions, is not an ideal one. In these cases, I believe having the cleverness to make a conclusive resolution holds more weight.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
The argument that the leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
.... However, the two aspects of the issue arent as disparate as they seem. While it is ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...en, a leader is an influential force to a large number of people. Consequently, their actions pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... welfare, proving to the masses that he is deserving of the post. Following that, these peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...de due to the interdependencies between a leaders good judgement and their ability to mai...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97209302326 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74408750316 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527906976744 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3989700275 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243836723367 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801283918191 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659319719231 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157204792548 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520450015722 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.