In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Leadership is vital for stability and success in any field.It is the quality which is possessed by only few individuals. Cases in which a firm or government is overthrown or brought down due to lack of leadership skills displayed are many. The author's claim that in any field be it business, politics, education those in power should be required to step down after 5 years seems to consider changes will always bring postive impacts but this is very simplistic in nature and it fails to take into account the disadvantages or disasters it will lead to.
Let us consider the case of business, the decisions and power of the company is with CEO,CTO and others. They are inturn accountable for their shareholders. People in power need to understand the business and interact with their employee and understand the current technologies and market trends and then work on bringing a new technology or a new product and establish themselves in the society and earn the trusts of the people. So if every 5 years people in power are changed it is possible that due to egoistic clashes the new leaders may dissolve the previous reforms/products introduced by previous leaders and it may even lead to disastrous consequences of losing their market. So, the overall efforts which the company invested in the idea may become futile.
On the other hand, in case of education it may be fruitful in replacing those in power mainly because the approaches of modern education is changing so those in power for long term tend to lack skills or awareness of mindset of the students and thereby fail to bring in reforms which will promote more pragmatic way of approach to education rather than normal bookish study.
Finally, in case of government where corrupt practices are pretty high in ratio compared to other fields, if there is restriction for people to step down after 5 years, then this will conspicuously make the leaders to involve in bribery and will establish a mindset of looting as much money as they can when they are in power. Even Though there should be restriction on the number of years ,because progress and growth of nation depends on the more dynamic leaders it comes across but 5 years seems to too short in case of government officials.
To conclude, change is inevitable and much needed to bring in the dynamism of varied thoughts, it is also mandatory that current leaders should be given a much longer time frame more than 5 years to bring in reforms or new strategies and make them fruitful for the people.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 75
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Government should place few, if any , restrictions on scientific research and development 16
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 70
- Governments should place few, if any , restrictions on scientific research and development. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... for stability and success in any field.It is the quality which is possessed by on...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , CTO
...ons and power of the company is with CEO,CTO and others. They are inturn accountable...
^^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ld be restriction on the number of years ,because progress and growth of nation de...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247826086957 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.154347826087 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0826086956522 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0521739130435 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0369565217391 0.0444667217837 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14347826087 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0304347826087 0.0406280797675 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67357013668 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0391304347826 0.030933414821 126% => OK
Particles: 0.00217391304348 0.0016655270985 131% => OK
Determiners: 0.0804347826087 0.0997080785238 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0282608695652 0.0249443105267 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0130434782609 0.0148568991511 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2524.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 435.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80229885057 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342528735632 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266666666667 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165517241379 0.200843997647 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110344827586 0.132149295362 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67357013668 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487356321839 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.333183542 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 36.25 23.380412469 155% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.146898124 59.4972553346 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 210.333333333 141.124799967 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.25 23.380412469 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 62.9166666667 51.4728631049 122% => OK
Elegance: 1.73214285714 1.64882698954 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335659768231 0.391690518653 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147909070384 0.123202303941 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0695486278781 0.077325440228 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.670303042358 0.547984918172 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.231020843815 0.149214159877 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150906369892 0.161403998019 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121969737436 0.0892212321368 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.378252436089 0.385218514788 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0307677071706 0.0692045440612 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241115166377 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105772320746 0.0653680567796 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.