In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
In order for any society to prosper, its leaders play the most crucial roles. However, the need for probing the venality of any leader is similarly crucial as it becomes the dominant factor in the plummet of a society. Except for rare cases, especially in politics, those in power tend to exercise their power for their own benefits, and eventually lean towards corruption. Thus, as a general rule, requiring someone to step down from power after five years seems to be a reasonable approach.
There are several examples, especially in the developing or the under-developed nations, where, when a political party comes into power, it remains in power for decades – through the so-called “democratic process” as it likes to define (take Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh as an example), or through tyranny (take Gaddafi or Saddam Hussain as examples). Even if the initiation of its reign was with the right intentions, but its failure to keep its probity upright through the course of its power, makes it fear of castigation it might face if any other party takes its place. As a result, it turns towards immoral means to remain in power, and since there is no law to restrict its power to a certain time limit, it continues to breed on its wrongdoings; when someone is in power for so long, he/she eventually learns the vulnerabilities in the system and therefore can exploit it with much ease. However, if the person in power knows his/her timeframe to be in power, he/she will check vigorously his/her actions fearing persecution he/she might face once not in power.
Also, when someone stays in power for very long, a generation may loose on the experience of exercising power and thus not gain required leadership expertise and experience in the field. This is obviously important because each generation has its own perception of the world which may differ from others, and therefore needs to be addressed. But this would not be possible if someone remains in power for a long period.
However, it can also be true that the person currently in power is actually an assiduous and a candid individual with little or no venality, and also understands the people spread throughout the spectrum of different generations. Under such scenario, to remove such a person after five years will be counterproductive. However, unfortunately such scenarios are rare.
Human are slaves to their whims and desires and our leaders are not any exceptions - allowing them to remain in power for a long time increases the risk of them being indulged into corruptions. Therefore, steps should be taken which require those in power to resign from their position after five years interval.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 79
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 81
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years. 83
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...n power for very long, a generation may loose on the experience of exercising power a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, except for, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01118568233 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81151839446 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1120290632 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9375 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25707469355 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931558440673 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085886104179 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156711613816 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706418997187 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.