In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
To leave a mark in a field, it is true that we need to be influenced and motivated by the past achievements in that field, but sometimes, this philosophy may not turn out to be true.
"Records are made to be Broken" is as famous quote and though being a pun, it has a lot of truth to it. In the field of sports, all sportsmen look upto the records set by the previous top players. And this keeps the sportsmen constantly motivated and diligent. Usain Bolt, "the fastest man alive" has broken a lot of records in sprinting events and sprinters definelty look upto him. This not only keeps them motivated but also improves the quality of the players.
Role Models play another important role when it comes to performing beyond the excellent bar. All of successful people in the world, have had a role model in front of them the whole time. The prime minister of India, Narendra Modi has had Swami Vivekanda who is regarded as the symbol of light, youth and confidence as his Role Model. And if you closely observe the methodologies Modi follows, you will find them resembling to the teachings of Swami Vivekanda.
But that being said, to excel in something where there is no past achievement or attempts, requires a lot of courage and confidence. Take for example the first moon landing. Mankind had never imagined that someday, we would be exploring the moon. There was no past achievement as big as this one ever known to humans. Similarly, conquering the Mount Everest seemed imposible until Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay successfully did so.
In conclusion, past achievements do help in leaving a mark, but the ones who are self motivated and willing to do the impossible, and look beyond the previous achievements carve out history.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 18
- Educators should take students interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the fastest man alive' has broken a lot of records in sprinting events and s...
^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...d, to excel in something where there is no past achievement or attempts, requires ...
^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... would be exploring the moon. There was no past achievement as big as this one eve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, similarly, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75465483658 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582236842105 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3952638777 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165403884629 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479214771332 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679414928249 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103280806632 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907616295072 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.