Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future
The author in the above issue suggest to mistrust any information consider as fact. I am totally in agreement with the author view. Thus, there seems no loop for the author view. There are multiple reason for my acceptances with the author view. I would like to state it in above paragraph.
First of all, the author says to mistrust any information obtain as fact as in future it can be proved wrong. For example, few decades ago there was no existences of the life on the mars planet. As the advancement in the research took place, so the view for it also changed. Thus from the piece of fact which gives information might be proven wrong tomorrow. Moreover, there are multiple reason to prompt my approval.
Secondly, the invention and advancement is the basic nature of the today’s generation. Human thinking never stop and the advancement in the technology will thus will lead way for the betterment of the individual. For example, disease like cancer were incurable previously. With the advancement, this disease has also become curable. Thus on the specific information of today, we cannot make conclusion for tomorrow. Although most of the factual information is accurate but the facts are results of studies made by humans so they are bound to be incorrect sometimes. This generally happens in the field of medicines. Firstly, scientists would recommend a medicine for an ailment and in the next study it would be proved that the medicine has ill effects on human body.Thus due to above reason, I am in totally agreement with that of the author. However, a piece an information may lead to a fact. Moreover, it is easily said than it to be done. So to relate totally on the fact of today maybe dangerous of tomorrow.
Thirdly, during ancient age, there were many myths which where consider as a matter of the fact are overcome in today’s generation. Thus , there seems no disproval with the view of the author. Transformation is rule of the nature, so the with this transformation we cannot make sure to that of the future,
Further, I would like to wrap my discussion over this issue and bulk all above evidence. The fact of the information today can lead to the progression of the tomorrow. To trust on the specific information today is totally unreliable. New and better technology aids their studies and thus they come with new and better results. It is not necessary that facts are always inaccurate but their viability can certainly be questioned. As it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. Thus, I am in completely acceptance with that of author.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | Sunita086 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | rshivni | 83 | view |
| 2016-10-17 | Vaibhav1214 | 50 | view |
| 2016-10-17 | Vaibhav1214 | 50 | view |
| 2016-10-17 | Vaibhav1214 | 50 | view |
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished quot 75
- Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 50
- Nations should suspend govt. funding forthe arts when significant numbers of theircitizens are hungry and unemployed. 16
- Is it better for children to learn to read by using the online material or by using printed material? 56
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...place, so the view for it also changed. Thus from the piece of fact which gives info...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
..., this disease has also become curable. Thus on the specific information of today, w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
... medicine has ill effects on human body.Thus due to above reason, I am in totally ag...
^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... medicine has ill effects on human body.Thus due to above reason, I am in totally ag...
^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vercome in today's generation. Thus , there seems no disproval with the view ...
^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... viability can certainly be questioned. As it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. T...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tely acceptance with that of author.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'for example', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237051792829 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.131474103586 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0637450199203 0.0880659088768 72% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0657370517928 0.0497285424764 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0438247011952 0.0444667217837 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145418326693 0.12292977631 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0258964143426 0.0406280797675 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76967902311 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258964143426 0.030933414821 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115537848606 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0278884462151 0.0249443105267 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00597609561753 0.0148568991511 40% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2577.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 443.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81715575621 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.309255079007 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241534988713 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189616252822 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135440180587 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76967902311 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442437923251 0.48968727796 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.517833893 55.4138127331 88% => OK
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6194690265 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.7666666667 23.380412469 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9363807744 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 141.124799967 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7666666667 23.380412469 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.533333333333 0.674092028746 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 38.920165538 51.4728631049 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.69421487603 1.64882698954 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393193004056 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100023566079 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0851926618283 0.077325440228 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.449574353397 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158273251883 0.149214159877 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142720126261 0.161403998019 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973631025754 0.0892212321368 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.484405761611 0.385218514788 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.079405959617 0.0692045440612 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281691120393 0.275328986314 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809783276033 0.0653680567796 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.