In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Every individual is unique. He/she has his/her own thought process or different perspective to things around. It is an individual’s tendency to become dogmatic at times and consider one’s own opinions correct without evaluation. It is human nature to not accept the possibility of flaws in oneself. But for progress to be made in any field, it is necessary that a discussion takes place between parties having contrasting opinions. Nothing ever is considered accurate in life without evaluation.
Firstly, when people having contrasting opinions sit together for discussion on a particular matter, the matter is discussed exhaustively. For example, if a company plans to launch a new product in the market, there will be some in favor of the launch and some against it. If the views of only the supporters are heard, that will simple reinforce the company’s decision to launch the specific product. Similarly if the views of only those against it are heard, the company’s plan will be rescinded. Now if there is a healthy discussion about the pros and cons of launching the product, the company will come up with the best possible accurate decision by weighing the pros against the cons. Therefore, it will provide everyone involved a broader perspective on the case.
Furthermore, both sides on listening to each other will realize the flaws in their opinions. This will improve their ability to self-evaluate and correct themselves. They will become amicable and not denigrate others in life. Like in the example stated above, when the same persons get into a similar kind of situation again, they will definitely delve deeper into the matter and ultimately reach a better decision.
Finally, a discussion will help increase everyone’s knowledge about general topic. The gained knowledge will definitely help one at some point in life. Thus, progress in such cases is inevitable. On the contrary, it may also be possible that clashing opinions lead to arguments with no chance of reaching to a conclusion. The motive of the people involved in this case might change from finding a solution to rather demean others and prove oneself correct by hook or by crook. Such a scenario will definitely not provide an atmosphere conducive to progress rather entire matter will exacerbate. Like in the example, though the product actually will bring invaluable gains to both the company and the general public, but due to clashes, the company decides to drop the idea. This will definitely lead to loss.
Therefore, progress undoubtedly requires juxtaposing pros and cons in every field. Being partisan will not help positively.
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 16
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ecision to launch the specific product. Similarly if the views of only those against it a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 706, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...uable gains to both the company and the general public, but due to clashes, the company decide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24178403756 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88351307729 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523474178404 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0978666926 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8846153846 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26923076923 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930956846737 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272133646869 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482412531853 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529421724689 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325590165878 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.