In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
If there is a contrasting viewpoint, yes discussion is a must. Considering we are talking about a professional environment discussion has always been a free and effective source of renovation and development of a particular decision in an organisation. Discussion on a matter where conflicting points of view exist, it is better to inchoate the conflict by discussion, moreover, a discussion will help maintain a proper desirable work environment.
Two or more conflicting points of view will point out the pros and cons of both the sides, which the other decision makers were unaware of or might not have considered earlier. Numerous pros and cons will direct the decision makers to view the issue on a different scale as well as through different perspective, and then the decision makers can inspect, judge, summarise these presented issues to come up with a better option. Hence, discussions lead to a highly thoughtful, more effective and less erroneous decision. For example, a construction company has decided to build a hotel whose sewage will be led out through the existing sewage pipes, but a question has by put forward by an employee, what will happen to the slums living beside the sewage drains? People in the slumps are already living a deleterious life style and to add to their misery if we dump the hotel waste, which will be an extravagant amount, will surely finish off what are left of them. So considering the points of both the sides, construction of a more effective sewage treatment plant was adopted, and that is how the discussion has influenced the decision of the company.
Secondly, say the conflicting viewpoints are so strong that might lead to conflicts between the groups. Then such discussion has to be handled through discussion because in such situations suppressing one’s views over other will lead to unethical situations, and may eventually lead to implosion of the professional environment. Maintaining a good ethical work environment is necessary for higher productivity.
Democracy, the most preferred and most effective governance in the world hold discussion its top priority. Almost every decision put up by the government, has passed the process of screening through discussion, unlike monarchy and conservatives where a single person or group take the decision without considering others points of views. That is the reason why democracy has such wide acceptance as it allows its people to question the authority and help in the decision-making process through putting forward their views.
Therefore, in a nutshell, every conflicting point of view has to be settled through discussion, not only to subside the conflicts but to enhance the decision screening process, since discussions had always been an effective source of purifying any decision.
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 50
- School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. 83
- It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult,however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice. 51
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a newenvironment and, eventually, to change it. 66
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'talking about', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240404040404 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.165656565657 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0767676767677 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0545454545455 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0181818181818 0.0444667217837 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0989898989899 0.12292977631 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0585858585859 0.0406280797675 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03815580941 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0323232323232 0.030933414821 104% => OK
Particles: 0.010101010101 0.0016655270985 606% => OK
Determiners: 0.123232323232 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0262626262626 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181818181818 0.0148568991511 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2816.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 449.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27171492205 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41425389755 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300668151448 0.280924506359 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238307349666 0.200843997647 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.189309576837 0.132149295362 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03815580941 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498886414254 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 56.6324802897 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0625 23.380412469 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8876726792 59.4972553346 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.0 141.124799967 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0625 23.380412469 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.674092028746 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 58.1293151448 51.4728631049 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.66949152542 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340139954485 0.391690518653 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112346828256 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.068131730301 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587612116045 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177117551462 0.149214159877 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142797634345 0.161403998019 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648922531456 0.0892212321368 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.309145280695 0.385218514788 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0307366058347 0.0692045440612 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219436447742 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548379874972 0.0653680567796 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.