Due to the advancement of technology and facile in discussing in various issues, some may claim in any situation, people should discuss about any issues and find out contrasting ideas. Some other may believe it is not necessary to gather people ideas for different fields that may they do not have special knowledge. I mostly agree with the latter statement and I will explain my reasons now.
To contrast to the statement, it is not appropriate to ask people ideas in any situations because the specific hypothetical issue may need special knowledge to understand, and without completely understand the specific knowledge, the proposed idea may look absurd and ridicule. For instance, the structure of an engine of vehicles is very specific knowledge and people rarely know about that. Thus, people's ideas about the latest Lamborgini engine would not be efficient without understanding the basic knowledge of designing and producing steps. Therefore, people should leave specific knowledge for experts and they can use their ideas for making decisions or comparing with other types of cars.
In addition, some group of people may be biased about specific issue and considering their benefits in presenting ideas. Given transferring water of Isfahan province to Yazd province in Iran, the people of Isfahan may consider it is an unfair decision for themselves because they had more water for agriculture while after implementing this project, they may face some difficulties that lead to wasting their profits. On the other hand, Yazd natives may maintain that they have several problems not only in agriculture but also drink water and this project could solve their problems. They may think, Yazd located in dry area and it is essential for them to provide water from other places that have enough water. Finally, it seems some unbiased experts could gather all of the information and consider all the advantages and disadvantages to both area and then make decision about the project.
On the other hand, some believe that there are lots of areas that people could present their ideas and, in fact, their ideas could change the path of the country. For example Bergsit in the UK, experts provide several advantages and disadvantages of Bergsit and people with different ideas compare them. Finally, people decided to change the method their country trade with other European countries.
In conclusion, although there are lots of situations that people should present their ideas and contrast different sides, it is irrelevant to consider these situations for all of the events. Given the situations that needs experts’ ideas and specific knowledge or when people are biased and they more consider their advantage instead of general benefit.
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 62
- Alcohol related deaths 2005 and average beer consumption Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagram Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eems some unbiased experts could gather all of the information and consider all the advant...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...levant to consider these situations for all of the events. Given the situations that needs...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24036281179 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61215631936 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471655328798 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.144478371 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.941176471 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9411764706 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127197042795 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537832822011 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404129047016 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905953986386 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051628667993 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.