Due to the advancement of technology, the Internet, and specifically social media, spreading scandals are rapidly increased. People use these websites or applications to share their news. Some claim these scandals and spreading in the society would be beneficial, while some believe it has several disadvantages for society. I mostly agree with the latter one and I will explain my reasons.
First of all, most of the scandals are proposed false information and these can destroy the face of celebrities, sportsmen, or officials. Thus, these people should waste their time and money to show the scandals are wrong whereas they could spend this time and money on better purposes. For example, George Cloney, one of the famous actors in Hollywood, faced scandals that accused his sexual abuse of his colleague. He had to lay off his job for one year because no director wanted to work with him while before this scandal he always had some proposed jobs. He spent about a year following it in court and finally, the court result showed he was not guilty.
Moreover, the origin of scandals is unknown. Any people could concoct a scandal and due to his power in social media, he could spread his scandal. Thus, some companies, organizations, or even newspapers abuse this ability and try to sell their products or guide public opinions. For example, in the COVID-19 pandemic period, a scandal spread in Iran that Remesiders, a medicine, could remedy the disease completely. People started to buy the stock of producers of this product in Iran. After about a week, The share of these companies increase twice and the news showed that it is just a complementary effect on the disease, not a complete remedy. It seems somebody tried to take advantage of the situation and gain money by selling their share at high prices.
On the other hand, some maintain that in the dictatorship society, there is not any way to demonstrate the corruptions of the governors. Because they force newspapers and news agencies to propagate the news that only supports their ideas. In this situation, scandals can help individuals to share their news about governors. So, they can freely spread their news via social media without fear of jail because it is difficult for the government to find out the origin of the news.
In conclusion, although scandals may have some benefits in special situations, I reckon it mostly has disadvantages like destroy the fame of celebrities or governors while the proposed information would not be right.
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99285714286 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70656692789 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521428571429 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8925492285 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10961746893 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341489818492 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253188947748 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635646170846 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01729408584 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.