“Art does not exist unless it is shared; it requires both artist and audience.”
Art encompasses a number of forms and media. Art can include the visual arts, including paintings and photographs, auditory arts, such as music recordings, performance arts, including live performances of dance, theatre and music on a platform. The existence of art, or the criteria one can call art “art”, I think depends on the creator and the purpose of executing that piece of “art” in the first place.
In order to analyse the topic that art does not exist unless it is shared, the purpose of creating the art needs to be interrogated. For example, if a theatre group is performing a play to raise awareness of a certain social issue, and that is the primary purpose, then art does not exist unless there is an audience to engage with that message and appreciate the art form with which the message was conveyed through. Similarly, performance arts would be rendered “pointless” if there is no audience to share it with. After all, it is a performance, a show, put on for the enjoyment of the consumers, who is the audience.
However, purpose is context bound. If the purpose of learning the piano was just for a little fun and to relax, art would exist without there being an audience. Similarly, decorating one’s room with one’s own painting does not require a third party to consume the art form. The artist could be both the creator and audience of the piece of work, but that does not mean that art needs to be shared in order to exist.
Furthermore, art is very subjective. How does one define “art”? What makes a few colourful scribbles on a sheet of paper different from a masterpiece of modern art in a museum? What sets the two apart? The old adage, beauty is in the eye of the beholder holds very true here. As along as the creator deems the creation to be a work of art, art exists and does not need to be consumed by an external audience. A more tangible example would be, a struggle artist who has been able to engage with an audience yet but continues to churn out works of “art”, be it recordings of music or paintings after paintings, still calls him or herself an artist and hence art exists, even in the absence of an audience.
On the whole, art can exist independent of the viewers, however, the importance and the role that the audience plays greatly depends upon the purpose of the artwork and the creator’s intention of having produced the piece of art.
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpointReason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does on really discover the value of that idea. 83
- It is not possible for one person to succeed without another somewhere failing Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim made above In your response use specific examples and explain how those examples shape your position 50
- “Art does not exist unless it is shared; it requires both artist and audience.” 50
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 69
- to get a better sense of the recreational needs of the community the teeburg town Board sent a questionnaire addressed to the head of household in every home in the town the board asked a series of questions designed to zero in on residents recreational p 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, third, after all, for example, i think, such as, on the whole, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77336448598 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9283000261 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488317757009 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3100639471 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.526315789 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477671885783 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147904283636 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120648999807 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283183821494 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625311446834 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.