To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that a public official must hold the highest moral and ethical standards in order to be an effective leader. Although the higher moral and ethical standards could not directly indicate that an officer have the ability to manage a country, the first condition being a leader is holding the highest ethical and moral standards; Thus, I strongly agree with the speaker.
To begin with, leaders must hold the highest ethical and moral standards, because they have social obligation. Leaders have to regard the public interests as first priority rather than personal interests; They should not sacrifice public interests because of personal interests. The African conflict is an illustration of this view point. For personal interest, Africa’s leaders launch many brutal wars in Africa without minding victims. If leaders lose the ethical and moral standards, their countries are incapable of operating normally. In a word, leaders must maintain the highest moral and ethical standards in order to fulfill their responsibility.
Secondly, leaders holding the highest moral and ethical standards will facilitate development of country well, since they plan the country’s development in the long run. In the process of planning project, they consider the overall situation, because the leaders having high ethical and moral standards indicates they can consider other’s feeling. For example, Obama, who has no negative evaluation, is a greatness leader. In his presidency, he addressed the global financial crisis and included a major stimulus package, including legislation to reform health care and a major financial regulation reform bill, and the end of a major US military presence In Iraq. In sum, leaders who the highest moral and ethical standards can make country stable developing.
On the other hand, considering from a short-term, moral and ethical standards is the basis that people select a leader, and is the premise of being a leader. In the election, voters evaluate the candidates’ ability based on candidates’ ethical and moral standards. If candidates lose the baseline of the moral and ethical standards, they will lose the probability of becoming a leader. For instance, Hillary Clinton’s email controversy, this bad news from Clinton had decreased average lead in the polls. As a result, she loses the probability of becoming a leader. In brief, moral and ethical standards is the base that voters select a leader.
To sum up, first of all, leaders must hold the highest moral and ethical standards, because they have social responsibility. Then, leaders having high moral and ethical standards will make country developing well in the long run, Finally, moral and ethical standards is the foundation that voters select a leader. With these reasonings, I totally agree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | nipuntestbig | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | ajay@123 | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | idris oriyomi | 54 | view |
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling r 50
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in brief, as a result, first of all, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41031390135 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77074620403 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459641255605 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1107722805 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.681818182 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.59090909091 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285939509199 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107532292315 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832571752634 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199531098049 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690717093136 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.