Leaders have always been a reflection of the group they lead. When we consider political leaders, they come from within society and are chosen by the people of society. So they understand the hardships that people are going through. Even when we consider company leaders, they are a representative of the collection of employees. Hence, the best leaders always encourage feedback from whom they lead which will result in positive or negative reinforcement.
When elections take place, political leaders set out their plans for the upcoming term and address the problems that he/she would like to tackle. People elect their leaders based on these policies or plans. So it would be obvious for the leaders to take feedback from the people they are representing to understand if people are happy with how things are going. If people don't agree with some policies or changes the leaders are making, it would affect the leaders future prospects of being re-elected.
In the corporate world, such practice is extremely common. Nowadays, all managers give a feedback of the employees working under them, along with the employees giving a feedback of the leaders to the Human Resources department. This ensures that the work environment is good and people are satisfied with the direction in which things are moving. Also, teachers these days take feedback from students so the teachers can improve and work on things that will help the class be more engaging and interactive.
Furthermore, I would like to emphasize my point by citing a few examples. One of the best football coaches of all time Sir Alex Ferguson was struggling with the emergence of other competitors surpassing his Manchester United team, and he had a big spat with David Beckham which was publicized to great extent. He turned to his senior players to understand what changes could they do to the style of play or if he was doing something wrong. This led to a healthy discussion between them and Manchester United came back stronger than ever.
Similarly, Arwind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, has introduced a policy in which his policies and decisions can openly be criticized by people of the society. As he believes this will only lead to improvement of his decision making and in turn improve conditions. However, leaders shouldn't always do what people like and make their decisions. This is the reason why they have reached that designation and are trusted by the people to lead
I would like to conclude by saying, that it is always beneficial to hear what the people they represent have to say and in turn use this feedback for better decision making.
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 62
- "To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major supermarkets, where it hopes word-of-mouth advertising will sustain sales 63
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 62
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...py with how things are going. If people dont agree with some policies or changes the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...rn improve conditions. However, leaders shouldnt always do what people like and make the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96606334842 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61287534828 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9478416876 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.523809524 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47619047619 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338473073696 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100609242208 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100945651022 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171036002034 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11640844485 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.