Teaching is one of the most noble jobs in the world, however in many nations it is undermined and not given the respect it deserves. The author's suggestion is extreme and by basing teacher's salaries on students' academic performance would be unfair.
First of all, we must consider that teachers of different subjects cannot be earning the same salary. A teacher of Nanotechnology at a prestigious university ,cannot be earning the same amount to a first grade Math teacher. So we have teachers who teach different subjects and different classes and they cannot be put in the same bracket. Also, teachers have different qualifications and their earnings should be reflecting that, one teacher might be a PhD, and other teachers cannot expect to be earning as much as him.
Moreover, many teachers teach a various sets of classes and their workload and salary must be proportionate to that. For example if a teacher is teaching Math for students for all the classes of elementary school, his earnings cannot be compared to a teacher teaching English only to one particular class of students.
Furthermore, teachers who teach children with disabilities cannot be judged on the academic performance of students as compared to able children. If we implement the suggestion made, teachers might start teaching easier topics and might not teach the subjects with as much depth as they would.
Finally, if good teachers start to feel there financial aspirations are not being fulfilled they might look for jobs elsewhere and this will result in a decline of quality of education.
As education is arguably the most important part of shaping young children into mature adults, the suggestion to base teacher's salaries on their students' academic performance would definitely deteriorate the quality of education.
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 62
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 55
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 62
- "To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major supermarkets, where it hopes word-of-mouth advertising will sustain sales 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... not given the respect it deserves. The authors suggestion is extreme and by basing tea...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...notechnology at a prestigious university ,cannot be earning the same amount to a f...
^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'set'?
Suggestion: set
...Moreover, many teachers teach a various sets of classes and their workload and salar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly to one particular class of students. Furthermore, teachers who teach children...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19178082192 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83975774619 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489726027397 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9312071337 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286765653827 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129902007506 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875252497501 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15786309683 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520860742656 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.